Representation nationwide. Clientele worldwide.
Call For a Free Case Consultation
404-445-6486

Fourth Amendment Search Issue Goes to the Dogs

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on March 26,2013 in Florida v. Jardines (http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/11-564_5426.pdf )

that the use of a drug-sniffing dog to investigate the front door of a home was a "search" within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. Thankfully, the Supreme Court ruled this way - or we'd have police trolling apartment complexes, buildings, public spaces, etc with an army of intrusive sniffing dogs. The justices ruled that having a dog sniffing at one's door was indeed a search, and thus subject to the limitations of the Fourth Amendment.

Whether a police officer bringing a drug dog to sniff the door to a residence constitutes "trespassing" is an interesting issue brought up in this case. We will see how this court's ruling will be played out as time progresses. The court found it unnecessary to determine whether the officers violated Jardines' "reasonable expectation of privacy", instead they focused on whether the officers' physical intrusion on the porch established that the search had occurred.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Recognized Leaders

Atlanta Law Office 75 Fourteenth Street NW Suite 3000 Four Seasons Office Tower Atlanta, GA 30309 Phone: 404-445-6486 Atlanta Law Office Map

New York Office 405 Lexington Avenue 26th Floor New York, NY 10174 Phone: 404-445-6486 New York Law Office Map