To understand the specifics of this case, below we have quoted directly from the Petitioner’s Brief:

This case concerns the constitutionality of geofence warrants. For cell phone users to use certain services, their cell phones must continuously transmit their exact locations to their service providers. A geofence warrant allows law enforcement to obtain, from the service provider, the identities of users who were in the vicinity of a particular location at a particular time. In this case, law enforcement obtained, and served on Google, a geofence warrant seeking anonymized location data for every device within 150 meters of the location of a bank robbery within one hour of the robbery. After Google returned an initial list, law enforcement sought— without seeking an additional warrant—information about the movements of certain devices for a longer, two-hour period, and Google complied with that request as well. Then—again without seeking an additional warrant—law enforcement requested de anonymized subscriber information for three devices. One of those devices belonged to petitioner Okello Chatrie. Based on the evidence derived from the geofence warrant, petitioner was convicted of armed robbery.

The last time the Supreme Court wrestled with cell phone privacy issues was in Carpenter v. United States, 585 U.S. 296 (2018), which is a landmark United States Supreme Court case concerning the privacy of historical cell site location information. The Court held in that case that the government violates the Fourth Amendment when accessing historical cell phone Iocation records containing the physical locations of cellphones without a search warrant. That case, however, was after a suspect was identified, making it unlike the current case before the Supreme Court.

We receive terabytes of data in discovery for our cases. Motions to suppress can be filed for all of the data seized from search warrants of phones. We are cognizant of the ever changing landscape of Fourth Amendment case law. We ensure that law enforcement follows the appropriate procedures for every single case. Contact us now if you have a case you would like to discuss.

The “newer” question on page 1 of the Tax Form 1040 now has a question that states, “At any time during the past year did you receive any financial interest in virtual currency?” In 2019, this question was only on Schedule 1.  As of 2020, it is on page 1 of the Tax Form 1040.  This is specifically targeted to combat cryptocurrency tax evasion.

Under 26 U.S.C § 7206(1), it is a criminal offense to file a tax return the filer knows is materially false.  So, if you do not check that box on that first page, AND have substantial income in crypto, you might be targeted by the IRS.  Remember cryptocurrencies are essentially similar to common stocks.  This means a taxpayer must report their gains in cryptocurrencies on Form 8949.  These gains are passed through to Schedule D on personal returns.  The filer is responsible for paying capital gains tax on the net gain for the year.  The government is long since versed in understanding the intricacies of the market like the role of hardware wallets, the use of DEXs, on-chain information, and how to track crypto movement across distributed ledgers.   Please see here for a recent  example of a case where non-payment of federal income tax on cryptocurrency earnings led to a conviction.

Contact Conaway & Strickler, PC if you have any questions on these complex federal criminal tax issues.  Our experienced federal criminal defense attorneys are here to help.

• Wire fraud
• Mail fraud
• Bank fraud
• Tax fraud (tax evasion or false statements)
• Healthcare fraud/FCA
• Medicare/Medicaid fraud
• PPP loan or COVID relief fraud
• Securities fraud
• Mortgage fraud
• Immigration or visa fraud
• Government contract fraud
• Identity theft or benefits fraud
• Trafficking in Counterfeit Goods or Services
• Anti kickbacks
• AML

The FBI gives this list of frauds and the DOJ publishes some of their cases here.

Fraud investigations can begin in a number of ways. In many cases, they are triggered by:

• A whistleblower or former employee
• A suspicious activity report
• A suspicious activity report (SAR) from a bank or financial institution
• Data flagged by automated fraud detection software
• A referral from another federal agency (e.g., IRS, SBA, USPS, HHS)
• A civil audit or regulatory review that uncovers irregularities
• Investigative journalism or public tips
• Problems in real estate transactions.  (FINCEN’s new rule extends Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (CFT) obligations to investment advisers involved in these transactions)

Once red flags are detected, the matter is referred to a federal investigative agency. These can include:

• Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
• Internal Revenue Service – Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI)
• Office of Inspector General (OIG)
• Postal Inspection Service (USPIS)
• Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
• Health and Human Services (HHS)
• Small Business Administration (SBA)

If you have been contacted by federal agents FOR ANY REASON, contact a federal criminal defense attorney immediately.  Do not speak period.  If you have received a grand jury subpoena, contact a federal criminal defense attorney immediately.  If you have received a target letter, contact a federal criminal defense attorney immediately.  If you are being audited by the IRS, SBA, HHS or another agency, contact a federal criminal defense attorney immediately. It never hurts in this  last instance to have sage advice before the investigation goes any further.

At Conaway & Strickler, PC, we are here to help. Contact us to discuss your options.

1. NPDB Reports. Licensing boards are generally required to report such these informal agreements involving physicians to the National Practitioners Data Bank (“NPDB”). (See45 CFR § 60.8). Hospitals and other entities are required or permitted to check the NPDB during the physician credentialing process. An NPDB report can permanently tarnish a physician’s record and career, unless it is removed, and it may also result in the additional actions outlined below.
2. Reciprocal Actions by Other State Licensing Boards. Many if not all state licensing boards automatically impose reciprocal sanctions against providers who were sanctioned in another state; thus, the action in one state may result in similar actions in other states in which the provider is licensed. That, of course, compounds the physician’s problems.
3. Adverse Action by Other Agencies. Other agencies may initiate their own investigation based on the board’s order. For example, an order with terms relevant to prescribing practices can trigger an investigation by the state pharmacy board. A stipulation involving inappropriate conduct with the patient might lead to criminal charges by the local law enforcement agency. Although such collateral investigations are fairly rare and are usually limited to situations involving egregious facts, there is no guarantee that the physician will be able to avoid lengthy and costly investigations or proceedings by other agencies.
4. Adverse Employment Action. Employment contracts often condition employment on an unrestricted license and require the provider to disclose or represent that the provider has not been the subject of adverse licensure action. Depending on the language of the contract and the mood of the employer, a seemingly innocuous board order may result in loss of employment. At the very least, it will likely undermine the provider’s position with the employer.
5. Adverse Credentialing Actions. Like employment contracts, hospitals or other facilities consider adverse licensure actions in their credentialing decisions. Depending on the medical staff bylaws and credentialing policies, licensure stipulations may allow the hospital or facility to deny, suspend, restrict, or terminate a provider’s medical staff membership or privileges, thereby limiting the provider’s practice options. Such adverse credentialing actions may also adversely affect the physician’s employment or relationships with payers who are affiliated with the hospital.
6. Adverse Publicity. In most states, the licensing board is permitted or required to publish the action. Colleagues, patients and others in the community are likely to learn of the stipulation, resulting in professional embarrassment, diminished reputation, and loss of business.
7. Malpractice Insurance. Depending on underwriting requirements, a board order may adversely affect the provider’s ability to secure or maintain professional liability insurance or the premiums charged for such insurance.
8. Litigation. Finally, the stipulation may result in civil lawsuits. The stipulation may spark suits by plaintiffs affected by the underlying concerns. In addition, plaintiffs’ lawyers may attempt to use the stipulation in subsequent litigation against the provider. Even though the stipulation will likely be irrelevant and inadmissible to most malpractice cases, it can still cause discomfort and increase the costs of defense.

Given the potential penalties, providers should carefully consider the consequences of any consent order entered into with the Board. If there is no effective defense to the allegations, the provider may have little choice but to agree to an appropriate stipulation to minimize costs and avoid potentially worse sanction; however, the provider should attempt to negotiate the terms in the stipulation to minimize his or her exposure. For example, the board might be willing to agree to a private censure or public reprimand instead of imposing restrictions or conditions on licensure. Alternatively, the provider might be able to modify the stipulation to confirm that it does not constitute a restriction on the license, does not limit the physician’s practice, and there was no harm or risk to patients. The provider might try to include other provisions that mitigate the harm or minimize the need for future disclosures. As appropriate, the provider should work with a knowledgeable attorney to help evaluate the risks and craft the stipulation in a manner to minimize the damage it will undoubtedly cause. For a consultation, contact us today.

Kousisis comes before the Court after a Philadelphia-area government contractor was found guilty of fraud after it failed to comply with a contract provision intended to promote diversity. Stamatios Kousisis and Alpha Painting and Construction Co., Inc. (Alpha) secured two substantial contracts with the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT). These contracts mandated a certain percentage of work to be allocated to Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBEs). Kousisis and his company misrepresented their compliance with this requirement by using a DBE as a mere pass-through entity, thereby falsely claiming adherence to the DBE participation goals. Despite this deception, the contracted work was completed to PennDOT’s satisfaction, and no direct financial loss was incurred by the department.

Federal prosecutors charged Kousisis and Alpha with wire fraud, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, and making false statements. The prosecution’s argument was based on the “fraudulent inducement” theory, suggesting that the defendants obtained the contracts through deceptive promises, even though PennDOT did not suffer a financial loss. Ultimately, Kousisis was sentenced to 70 months’ imprisonment for the multi-million dollar fraud he perpetrated following a jury trial in 2018.

However, the defense has argued that for a fraud conviction, there must be an intent to cause economic harm, which they claim was absent in this case. During oral arguments, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson posed the question, “Why isn’t this a classic scheme to obtain property under false pretenses?” For years in federal white-collar cases, the “scheme” itself has always been recognized as the “harm” that triggers application of the federal fraud statutes. Despite that precedent, defense argued: “If there’s no harm that occurs in those transactions, there is no fraud.”

It seems that conservative justices were receptive to the defendant’s argument. Chief Justice John Roberts suggested that “such crimes were better handled by state prosecutors.” Justice Samuel Alito expressed that “the court really doesn’t like the federalization of white-collar prosecutions and wants that to be done in state court and is really hostile to this whole enterprise.”

The outcome of Kousisis v. United States holds the potential to redefine the scope of federal white-collar prosecutions. A decision favoring the defendants could lead to a substantial shift in prosecutorial responsibilities from federal to state authorities. A ruling that limits federal jurisdiction in such cases would compel companies to adapt by focusing more on state-level compliance and legal frameworks. Engaging with experienced legal counsel will be essential for businesses to remain compliant and mitigate risks in this evolving legal landscape.

“Cyber extortion is unfortunately a rapidly growing threat and highlights the ever-growing need for corporations to remain vigilant in cybersecurity efforts,” said Sean Burke, Acting Special Agent in Charge of FBI Atlanta. “This sentencing is just one example of the FBI working together to hold criminals that hide behind their computers accountable, regardless of their location.”

According to information presented in court, in June 2017, Purbeck purchased access to the computer server of a Griffin medical clinic on a darknet marketplace. He then used the stolen credentials to illegally access the computers of the medical clinic and removed records that contained the sensitive personal information of more than 43,000 individuals, including names, addresses, birth dates, and social security numbers.

In February 2018, Purbeck purchased access to a City of Newnan Police Department server on a darknet marketplace. Purbeck used the stolen credentials to hack into the City of Newnan’s computer systems and stole police reports and other documents, including personal information of more than 14,000 individuals.

Purbeck also attempted to extort a Florida orthodontist in July 2018, demanding a ransom payment in Bitcoin in return for his stolen patient files, threatening to sell the patient and personal information unless the orthodontist paid the ransom. Additionally, Purbeck threatened to sell the personal information of the orthodontist’s minor child. Purbeck harassed the orthodontist and his patients for 10 days with numerous threatening emails and text messages.

Song Wu, Chinese national, was indicted in September 2024, on charges for wire fraud and aggravated identity theft arising from his efforts to fraudulently obtain computer software and source code created by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (“NASA”), research universities, and private companies.

“Efforts to obtain our nation’s valuable research software pose a grave threat to our national security,” said U.S. Attorney Ryan K. Buchanan. “However, this indictment demonstrates that borders are not barriers to prosecuting bad actors who threaten our national security.” According to information presented in court, Song allegedly engaged in a multi-year “spear phishing” email campaign in which he created email accounts to impersonate U.S.-based researchers and engineers and then used those imposter accounts to obtain specialized restricted or proprietary software used for aerospace engineering and computational fluid dynamics. This specialized software could be used for industrial and military applications, such as development of advanced tactical missiles and aerodynamic design and assessment of weapons. In executing the scheme, Song allegedly sent spear phishing emails to individuals employed in positions with the United States government, including NASA, the U.S. Air Force, Navy, and Army, and the Federal Aviation Administration.  Song also sent spear phishing emails to individuals employed in positions with major research universities in Georgia, Michigan, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Indiana, and Ohio, and with private sector companies that work in the aerospace field. Song’s spear phishing emails appeared to the targeted victims as having been sent by a colleague, associate, friend, or other person in the research or engineering community. His emails requested that the targeted victim send or make available source code or software to which Song believed the targeted victim had access. According to the indictment, while conducting this spear phishing campaign, Song was employed as an engineer at Aviation Industry Corporation of China (“AVIC”), a Chinese state-owned aerospace and defense conglomerate headquartered in Beijing, China.  AVIC manufactures civilian and military aircrafts and is one of the largest defense contractors in the world.

Ilya Lichtenstein, 35, of New York City, was sentenced recently to 60 months in federal prison for his involvement in a money laundering conspiracy arising from the hack and theft of approximately 120,000 bitcoin from Bitfinex, a global cryptocurrency exchange. According to information presented in court, Lichtenstein hacked into Bitfinex’s network in 2016, using advanced hacking tools and techniques. Once inside the network, Lichtenstein fraudulently authorized more than 2,000 transactions transferring 119,754 bitcoin from Bitfinex to a cryptocurrency wallet in Lichtenstein’s control. Lichtenstein then took steps to cover his tracks by deleting from Bitfinex’s network access credentials and other log files that could have revealed his conduct to law enforcement. Following the hack, Lichtenstein enlisted the help of his wife, Heather Morgan, in laundering the stolen funds. Lichtenstein, at times with Morgan’s assistance, employed numerous sophisticated laundering techniques, including using fictitious identities to set up online accounts; utilizing computer programs to automate transactions; depositing the stolen funds into accounts at a variety of darknet markets and cryptocurrency exchanges and then withdrawing the funds; converting bitcoin to other forms of cryptocurrency in a practice known as “chain hopping;” depositing a portion of the criminal proceeds into cryptocurrency mixing services; using U.S.-based business accounts to legitimize Lichtenstein’s and Morgan’s banking activity; and exchanging a portion of the stolen funds into gold coins. Additional information on this case is available on the United States Department of Justice’s website for large cases here.  

Question: What types of issues come before the State of Georgia Nursing Board?

Answer: Below are some common issues the Board handles. Many of these issues may overlap, as most of this conduct also constitutes a crime.

1. Mishandling/misuse of drugs. This includes diverting medications intended for patients, taking medications for your own use, failing to document or inventory medications correctly, or submitting unauthorized prescriptions to pharmacies.
2. Sexual misconduct. This could include allegations of inappropriate sexual relationships with patients or sexually harassing colleagues.
3. Patient abuse or neglect. If a nurse physically, verbally, or mentally abuses a patient, or fails to provide them with timely or sufficient treatment, this could result in the loss of the nurse’s license.
4. Fraud. This may include allegations of falsifying patient records, misrepresenting credentials like education credits or diplomas, sending incorrect or inflated bills to insurance companies, etc.
5. Criminal convictions. Many convictions can disqualify nurses from practicing (such as driving under the influence or drug possession). Importantly, you can also lose your license if you do not disclose a past conviction (see below for more on the license renewal process).

Question: What happens when a complaint is filed against you?

Answer: If a complaint is filed against you with the board of nursing, the Board will review the complaint and open an investigation. If the allegations are serious, the board can issue an emergency temporary suspension of your license during the disciplinary process. Depending on the allegations, an investigator may be appointed to gather all necessary information, including documents, witness testimony, etc. The board may also ask you to submit a written response to the allegations in the complaint, along with any supporting evidence. The board will then decide whether there is enough evidence to support the allegations against you and move forward.

The Board may offer a consent order, allowing you to accept penalties without a formal hearing. The consent order typically involves admission to the wrongdoing and submitting to the disciplinary action recommended. If you decline, a formal hearing will be held, and disciplinary actions may follow. If no consent order is agreed to, you will be asked to appear at a formal hearing to defend yourself against the charges. After the hearing, the board will make a final determination. This could range from public reprimand to the suspension or revocation of your license. Even a minor disciplinary action can become a matter of public record, affecting your career and permanent reputation. It is critical to have a qualified attorney guiding you through this process.

Question: Why hire a nursing license defense attorney?

Answer: When a complaint is filed against you, the board of nursing does not consider you innocent until proven guilty, immediately putting you at a disadvantage. The Nursing Board’s primary goal is to protect the public, not defend nurses. With your career at stake, navigating the complexities of an investigation without legal assistance can be risky. Retaining a nursing license defense attorney ensures that your rights are protected, representing your best interests every step of the way.

Question: What if you are concerned about the license renewing process?

Answer: If you’ve been arrested or convicted since your last renewal, you need to proactively address these issues with the board. Building a mitigation packet and addressing any concerns early can significantly increase your chances of renewing your license without penalties. At Conaway & Strickle, PC, we are experienced in working with professionals to mitigate adverse Board actions related to arrests, substance abuse, and mental health issues. We can assist with not only getting your criminal case reduced or dismissed, but also renewing your license without sanctions.

Question: How can a DUI affect your nursing license in Georgia?

Answer: A DUI conviction in Georgia can result in probation and other penalties, such as random alcohol screenings, mental health evaluations, and restrictions on your nursing practice. These probationary conditions can last for years, depending on the severity of the case.

Below is a list of common probationary conditions that can be place on you following a DUI or an impaired driving under the influence of drugs charge in Georgia.

• Three years minimum probation (must be three years of continuous compliance, so the probationary period could be extended if you slip up)
• Psychotherapy Evaluation by a physician board certified in addiction medicine
• Psychotherapy Course of Treatment completion
• Quarterly Reports from Psychotherapist
• Mental and Physical Evaluation, with favorable finding pertaining to ability to perform duties
• Continuing Education Coursework
• Quarterly Reports from Employer
• Quarterly Reports from yourself
• Quarterly Reports from a Substance Abuse Treatment Aftercare program approved by the Board of Nursing
• Monthly PEth (blood alcohol) testing for first 12 months
• Bi-monthly random urine drug screens for duration of probationary period
• Random alcohol screens
• Enrollment in an Affinity Program, like the one offered by the Georgia Nurses Association
• Restrictions on nursing practice, often including an inability to practice in the following areas without prior Board of Nursing Approval: Agency/Pool Assignments; Private Duty Nursing; In-Home Nursing; Internal Float Pools; Travel Nursing; In-Home Hospice.
• Abstaining from alcohol, and mood-altering substances, including controlled substances unless prescribed.
• If prescribed any medication, providing a letter from the prescriber to both the Board of Nursing and the treatment/aftercare provider within 10-days of receiving such subscription.

Conclusion

If you’re facing challenges related to your nursing license, it’s important to act quickly. With the complexities of nursing board investigations and the potential damage to your reputation, having an experienced nursing license defense attorney is crucial. For more information, contact us today.

What Is the New FINCEN Rule?

FINCEN’s new rule extends Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (CFT) obligations to investment advisers involved in residential real estate transactions. The aim is to prevent illicit financial activities in an industry known for large cash transactions that can serve as vehicles for money laundering, fraud, and other financial crimes.

Previously, residential real estate investments, particularly those conducted through shell companies or trusts, offered a level of anonymity that bad actors could exploit. This new rule eliminates some of that opacity by requiring reporting and disclosure obligations for entities and individuals involved in these transactions.

The final rule imposes several key requirements:

1. Increased Reporting and Disclosure: Individuals and firms engaged in residential real estate investments must now report detailed information regarding the identity of buyers and sellers, the source of funds, and other financial details. This includes both U.S. and foreign investors, adding an extra layer of scrutiny for cross-border transactions.
2. Enhanced Due Diligence: Investment advisers and firms must now conduct thorough due diligence on clients and the source of their funds, ensuring that they comply with AML/CFT standards. This may involve verifying identities, examining financial records, and reporting suspicious activities to FINCEN.
3. Penalties for Non-Compliance: The rule includes penalties for individuals and firms that fail to meet the new AML/CFT obligations. Non-compliance could lead to fines, sanctions, or even criminal charges depending on the severity of the infraction.

For real estate investors, the new FINCEN rule adds a new layer of legal and financial oversight. While the intention is to weed out bad actors, the burden of proof is now on investors and their advisers to ensure compliance. This means that investors will need to be more transparent in their transactions, particularly regarding the source of their funds. Without proof of the funds coming from a legitimate source, criminal charges of money laundering and fraud can result.

As the FINCEN rule takes effect, compliance will be a critical concern for many in the real estate industry. Our firm is experienced in navigating the complex landscape of financial regulations, including defending clients against charges of money laundering and related financial crimes. We can help you understand your obligations under the new FINCEN rule and defend against any accusations of non-compliance or criminal misconduct.

This new regulation represents a major shift for the residential real estate industry. Whether you’re an investor or an adviser, staying compliant is no longer optional—it’s the law. The new FINCEN rule is set to take effect on December 1, 2025. If you have questions about the new rule and how it affects your business, contact ustoday for a consultation.

What is a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR)?

A Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) is a document that financial institutions are legally required to file with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) when they detect potentially suspicious behavior involving financial transactions. Once filed, these reports are sent to FinCEN, a division of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, which shares the information with law enforcement agencies for further investigation if necessary.

Why Do Banks File SARs?

Banks must comply with a variety of regulations designed to prevent financial crimes. One of the core elements of these regulations is monitoring customer transactions for anything that might indicate illegal or suspicious activity. A SAR is typically filed when a bank suspects that a transaction, or series of transactions, might involve:

• Money laundering: Attempting to disguise the origins of illegally obtained money by passing it through a legitimate banking system.
• Fraud: Including wire fraud, identity theft, and other deceptive financial activities.
• Structuring: Breaking down large sums of money into smaller deposits to avoid triggering reporting requirements (also known as “smurfing”).
• Unexplained large transactions: Transactions that don’t align with an individual’s or business’s typical activity or appear inconsistent with known financial patterns.

Common Triggers for SARs

Financial institutions are trained to spot red flags, and there are a number of scenarios that could trigger a SAR filing. Here are some of the most common:

1. Unusually Large Transactions: If an individual or business is suddenly moving unusually large amounts of money, especially in cash, this can raise red flags. Large deposits, withdrawals, or transfers that don’t align with normal activity patterns may prompt the bank to investigate further.
2. Frequent Cash Deposits Below $10,000: To avoid the $10,000 threshold that triggers an automatic Currency Transaction Report (CTR), some individuals break down larger sums into smaller deposits (a practice called structuring). If a bank detects this behavior, it will likely file a SAR.
3. Wire Transfers to High-Risk Countries: International wire transfers to or from countries that are known for terrorist activity, money laundering, or lacking robust financial regulations may result in a SAR filing.
4. Multiple Accounts Under One Name: Using multiple accounts to shuffle money back and forth—especially if the accounts seem unrelated to legitimate business or personal activities—can appear suspicious.
5. Account Activity Inconsistent with Known Business Practices: If a company typically processes small, regular transactions and suddenly starts handling large, irregular amounts, it might trigger suspicion. Likewise, if a personal account shows business-level activity, this could raise alarms.
6. Use of Shell Companies: Banks scrutinize accounts associated with shell companies that lack a clear purpose or business activity, as they are often used in money laundering schemes.
7. Unexplained Source of Funds: If the origin of deposited funds is unclear, or if large amounts of money are transferred without any legitimate explanation, the bank may file a SAR.

The Impact of a SAR Filing

When a bank files a SAR, it is confidential. The individual or business subject to the report is not directly informed; However, the bank may decide to take action based on its findings, which can include:

• Account closures: If the bank believes the activity is risky or potentially illegal, it may close your account or freeze any available funds.
• Increased monitoring: Your account may come under closer scrutiny, with more restrictions placed on transactions.
• Law enforcement involvement: If the behavior in question warrants it, the SAR could lead to a broader investigation by federal or state law enforcement agencies.

What to Do if You Believe a SAR Has Been Filed Against You

While you won’t be directly informed if a SAR has been filed, you may suspect something is amiss if your bank account is frozen, closed, or you’re contacted by law enforcement regarding your financial activity. If you find yourself in this situation, here are some steps to take:

1. Seek Legal Counsel: The most important thing you can do is consult with an experienced criminal defense attorney. A SAR filing could be the beginning of a serious investigation, and you’ll want legal guidance to protect your rights and interests.
2. Gather Financial Records: Be prepared to provide your attorney with all relevant financial records. This can help explain the nature of your transactions and demonstrate that they are legitimate.
3. Do Not Attempt to Explain Yourself to the Bank: Anything you say to the bank could be misinterpreted or used against you in a later investigation. Your attorney will be able to navigate these communications appropriately.

A Suspicious Activity Report can be a precursor to serious legal trouble, but it’s important to remember that it is not an accusation of a crime. Banks are required to report anything that appears suspicious, even if the behavior is ultimately lawful. If you find yourself facing consequences related to an SAR filing, don’t wait—contact us today for a consultation and take control of your situation before it escalates. If you are facing financial crime allegations, our skilled team of criminal defense attorneys is here to help.

What is the “Free Money Hack”?

The trend usually involves TikTok users claiming they have found ways to manipulate the financial system, offering viewers methods to “hack” or exploit bank accounts, cash apps, or credit systems to obtain free money. Some of these schemes involve:

• Overdraft exploits: Encouraging users to overdraw bank accounts and then supposedly avoid the consequences.
• Fake check schemes: Depositing fraudulent checks into accounts and withdrawing the funds before the bank detects the fraud.
• Refund fraud: Filing fake claims with companies to get refunds for purchases that were never made.

These tactics promise fast cash with minimal effort, but what they really deliver is financial and legal disaster.

Why Following the Trend is Illegal

What these TikTok videos don’t explain is the serious legal consequences of participating in such schemes. Fraud, theft, and exploiting banking systems for personal gain are criminal acts, regardless of how trendy or harmless they may seem in a 60-second clip.

Here are some common legal charges that can result from participating in these activities:

1. Bank Fraud: This is a federal crime that can result in hefty fines and imprisonment. Intentionally defrauding a financial institution is illegal under U.S. law, and following these TikTok hacks can quickly escalate into a federal investigation.
2. Wire Fraud: Many of these hacks involve electronic transfers or communications, which falls under wire fraud. This also carries severe penalties, including long prison sentences.
3. Check Fraud: Depositing fake or altered checks with the intent to withdraw funds is considered check fraud. Even if you think you’re being clever by pulling out the money before the bank catches on, it’s still a criminal act.
4. Identity Theft: Some of these schemes suggest using fake names or other people’s banking details, which could lead to identity theft charges. This is a serious offense with strict penalties.
5. Theft by Deception: If you knowingly mislead a financial institution or another individual to gain money or assets, this is classified as theft by deception. Penalties can include jail time and significant fines.

Participating in these “hacks” isn’t just risky from a financial perspective—it’s a direct pathway to legal repercussions that can follow you for the rest of your life. Depending on the scale of the fraud or theft, you could face:

• Criminal Charges: These could range from misdemeanors to felonies, depending on the amount of money involved and the nature of the crime.
• Restitution: If convicted, you could be required to pay back any money that was wrongfully obtained, along with additional penalties.
• Permanent Criminal Record: A fraud conviction can make it difficult to secure future employment, housing, or loans, and can damage your reputation permanently.

The allure of easy money is tempting, but it’s important to remember that many social media trends, like the “free money hack,” come with significant risks. Engaging in these activities can lead to criminal charges that affect your financial future and personal freedom. Before following any advice from TikTok or other social media platforms, it’s vital to understand the full legal ramifications.

If you’ve been accused of fraud or any criminal activity related to online schemes, our experienced legal team is here to help. Don’t hesitate to contact us today for a free consultation. The legal system can be complex and unforgiving, but with the right defense, you can navigate the process and work toward the best possible outcome

He is charged with violating antifraud provisions of federal securities law. He may soon face DOJ charges as well. The antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws prohibit the use of fraudulent statements or schemes in connection with the purchase or sale of securities. These provisions apply to all securities transactions, including exempt transactions, and to statements made orally or in writing.

The primary anti-fraud statutory provision is Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which is codified in 15 U.S.C. § 78j. The SEC enforces this provision primarily through Rule 10b-5, which prohibits the use of any “device, scheme, or artifice to defraud”. Rule 10b-5 also imposes liability for any misstatement or omission of a material fact, or one that investors would think was important to their decision to buy or sell a security. A fact is considered material if there is a substantial likelihood that the information would have been viewed by a reasonable investor as having significantly altered the total mix of information available.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and Department of Justice (“DOJ”) have been working together more often to combat unlawful tactics. They have thus strengthened their enforcement capabilities, leading to more effective identification and prosecution of insider trading and other securities violations.

If you have questions about whether or not you or your company are facing an investigation, contact us for further information. Our attorneys have represented many clients in SEC litigation and also when subsequent DOJ charges follow.

The False Claims Act (FCA), also known as the “Lincoln Law,” is a federal law that imposes liability on individuals and companies who defraud governmental programs. This includes submitting false invoices, making false statements to get paid by the government, or avoiding payment of money owed to the government. The law was originally enacted during the Civil War to combat fraud by government contractors supplying the Union Army with substandard goods; however, the FCA was strengthened in 1986, when Congress increased incentives for whistleblowers to file lawsuits alleging false claims on behalf of the government.

Under the FCA, individuals or entities can be held liable for knowingly submitting false or fraudulent claims for payment to the government. The FCA allows private individuals, known as “whistleblowers” or “relators,” to file lawsuits on behalf of the government and share in any monetary recovery. These lawsuits are known as qui tam actions. If the government intervenes in the lawsuit and recovers funds, the whistleblower is typically entitled to receive a portion of the recovered amount, often ranging from 15% to 30%. In fiscal year 2023, whistleblowers filed 712 qui tam suits, and this past year the Justice Department reported settlements and judgments exceeding $2.3 billion in these and earlier-filed suits.

The False Claims Act has been instrumental in recovering billions of dollars for the government and deterring fraudulent conduct in government programs and contracts. It is one of the most powerful tools available for combating fraud against the government in the United States. Healthcare fraud has remained a leading source of FCA claims in recent years.

The Justice Department has litigated several significant cases involving the Medicare Advantage program. The Cigna Group settled for $172 million to resolve allegations that it knowingly submitted and failed to withdraw inaccurate and untruthful diagnosis codes for its Medicare Advantage Plan enrollees to increase its payments from Medicare. Martin’s Point agreed to pay more than $22 million following allegations that it violated the FCA by submitting inaccurate diagnosis codes for its Medicare Advantage Plan enrollees. Other cases related to Medicare Advantage matters continue to be litigated including actions against the UnitedHealth Group, Independent Health Corporation, Elevance Health (formerly Anthem), and Kaiser Permanente.

Airports are high security environments with strict rules enforced through law enforcement, federal agents, TSA checkpoints, drug-sniffing dogs, US Marshals aboard flights, and more. Being arrested at an airport is overwhelming, scary, and often times, completely unexpected. However, the consequences of these arrest can be serious and long-lasting. An arrest at an airport could lead to detention by law enforcement, criminal charges, and the need to retain legal representation.

If you are arrested at an airport, you may be taken into custody and transported to a detention center or police station where you will be held and processed until further legal proceedings. However, this does not always happen at the airport – you may leave the airport and later have a warrant issued for your arrest. In that case, you would still need to turn yourself in for processing with law enforcement. In either circumstance, it is essential to remember your rights, including the right to remain silent and the right to legal counsel. Contacting an experienced criminal defense attorney will help you navigate that distressing process with an advocate by your side.

Airport arrests can lead to severe criminal charges depending on the circumstances of your case. Common criminal charges in this context cover a broad range including drug offenses, sexual offenses, firearm offenses, DUIs, disorderly conduct, battery, theft, trafficking, and fraud. You could also be arrested at the airport for entirely unrelated criminal charges if you are simply identified and apprehended pursuant to an active arrest warrant, such as this recent arrest in Atlanta. Committing crimes while aboard an aircraft (like interfering with the performance of the duties of a flight crew) can lead to federal criminal charges and even more severe penalties. Many of these charges carry significant terms of imprisonment and hefty fines.

A strong legal defense is crucial if you have been arrested at an airport or are under investigation for alleged conduct at an airport. A skilled criminal defense attorney will guide you through the process, explain the charges against you, and evaluate the evidence to develop a defense strategy tailored to your case.

At Conaway and Strickler, we craft a defense based on the unique circumstances of each case and work closely with our clients to pursue favorable resolutions. If you have been arrested or detained at an airport, it is important to hire an attorney that is experienced in this area of law and can safeguard your rights throughout each step of the process. Contact us for a free consultation regarding your case.

Money Laundering refers to the illegal process of concealing the origins of money obtained through criminal activities, making it appear as if it comes from a legitimate source. This is criminalized under 18 U.S.C. § 1956. Money laundering using NFTs involves the illicit use of these digital assets to disguise the origins of illegally obtained funds. In this context, individuals create a fake record of sales on the blockchain by selling NFTs to themselves using different accounts. Once finished, they sell the NFT to an unsuspecting buyer and repeat the process.

Fraud has grown increasingly common in the crypto landscape due to its anonymous and decentralized nature. Fraud involving NFTs can manifest in various ways due to the unique characteristics of these digital assets. This is mostly being prosecuted as wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1343. Some common forms of fraud associated with NFTs include:

1. Fake or Stolen NFTs: Fraudsters might create counterfeit NFTs by copying digital content and attempting to sell them as original or rare pieces. Additionally, they might steal someone else’s artwork or content and mint NFTs to sell without the creator’s consent.
2. False Representation: Individuals might misrepresent the ownership or authenticity of an NFT by falsely claiming it is associated with a particular creator or source, leading buyers to believe they are purchasing something of higher value or legitimacy than it actually holds.
3. Pump-and-Dump Schemes: Similar to traditional financial markets, some individuals may engage in pump-and-dump schemes within the NFT market. This involves artificially inflating the value of certain NFTs through false hype or manipulation, only to sell them off at a high price, leaving unsuspecting buyers with devalued assets.
4. Phishing and Scams: Scammers may use phishing techniques to trick NFT owners into providing their private keys or access to their digital wallets, allowing the fraudster to steal the NFTs. Additionally, fraudulent schemes and fake NFT marketplaces can deceive buyers and sellers into making transactions for non-existent or misrepresented NFTs.
5. Rug-Pull Scheme: As the term suggests, a “rug pull” refers to a scenario where the creator of an NFT and/or gaming project solicits investments and then abruptly abandons a project and fraudulently retains the project investors’ funds.

Law enforcement is continuing to prosecute these types of NFT schemes across the nation, in cases that allege millions of dollars being defrauded. Two defendants were charged for executing a $1 million NFT money laundering and fraud scheme in January 2022. In another NFT rug-pull, Aurelien Michel was charged for diverting $2.9 million dollars in an international fraud scheme.

Under proposed USSG 4C1.1, a client will receive a 2-level decrease to their offense level if a)no criminal history points,

b)did not receive a terrorism adjustment under §3A1.4

c)did not use violence or threats of violence,

d) did not cause death or serious injury,

e) did not commit a sex offense,

f) did not cause any victim substantial financial hardship,

g) did not possess or use a firearm or deadly weapon,

h) did not violate a victim’s civil rights,

i) did not commit a hate crime, an adjustment under §3A1.1 , and

j) did not receive an aggravating role adjustment pursuant to Chapter 3 of the USSG.

Also, another related amendment provides in Application Note 4 (A) to §5C1.1 “that a sentence other than imprisonment is generally appropriate” for a client in Zone A or B after a §4C1.1 reduction

Under proposed USSG 5C1.1, a non-custodial sentence is “generally appropriate” for a Zero-Point Offender in Zone A or B of the Sentencing Table. For reference, the highest range for a Zero-Point offender in Zone B is 8-14 months imprisonment. For Zero-Point offenders outside of Zone A and B, however, subsection (b) to 5C1.1 suggests a downward departure, including to probation, for Zero-point offenders if the applicable Guidelines range “overstates the gravity of the offense because the offense of conviction is not a crime of violence or an otherwise serious offense.”

Long and short, there is a more of a possibility to get probation in less complex fraud cases now.

Contact contact us to get more details.

First we asked, WHAT IS CRYPTOCURRENCY?

Its response:

Cryptocurrency is a digital or virtual currency that uses cryptography for security. A cryptocurrency is difficult to counterfeit because of this security feature. A defining feature of a cryptocurrency, and arguably its most endearing allure, is its organic nature. It is not issued by any central authority, rendering it theoretically immune to government interference or manipulation.

Cryptocurrencies are systems that allow for secure payments online which are denominated in terms of virtual “tokens.” These tokens are created using cryptographic techniques that allow them to be transferred between users without the need for a central authority. Bitcoin, the first and most well-known cryptocurrency, was created in 2009.

Cryptocurrencies have been gaining in popularity in recent years, as more and more people become aware of their potential benefits. These benefits include:

• Security: Cryptocurrencies are secured by cryptography, which makes them difficult to counterfeit or double-spend.
• Transparency: Cryptocurrencies are transparent and decentralized, which means that there is no central authority that controls them.
• Efficiency: Cryptocurrencies can be used to make secure, efficient, and low-cost payments.

However, there are also some risks associated with cryptocurrencies, such as:

• Volatility: The value of cryptocurrencies can be volatile, which means that they can lose value quickly.
• Hacking: Cryptocurrencies are vulnerable to hacking, as they are stored on digital platforms.
• Regulation: Cryptocurrencies are not currently regulated by governments, which means that there is no protection for consumers if they lose money investing in them.

Overall, cryptocurrencies are a new and innovative technology that has the potential to revolutionize the way we pay for goods and services. However, there are also some risks associated with them, so it is important to do your research before investing.

Second, we asked, WHAT IS CRYPTOCURRENCY CRIME?

Its response:Cryptocurrency crime is any crime that involves the use of cryptocurrency. This includes crimes such as money laundering, fraud, and theft.

Cryptocurrency crime is a growing problem, as the value of cryptocurrencies continues to rise. In 2021, cryptocurrency crime was estimated to be worth $14 billion. This is a significant increase from the $7.8 billion worth of cryptocurrency crime in 2020.

There are a number of factors that contribute to the growth of cryptocurrency crime. One factor is the anonymity of cryptocurrencies. Cryptocurrency transactions are typically recorded on a blockchain, but the identities of the participants are not always known. This makes it difficult for law enforcement to track down and prosecute criminals.

Another factor is the growing popularity of cryptocurrency exchanges. These exchanges allow users to buy and sell cryptocurrencies, and they often have poor security measures in place. This makes them easy targets for criminals.

Finally, the lack of regulation in the cryptocurrency industry makes it difficult for law enforcement to crack down on crime. There are currently no laws in many countries that specifically regulate cryptocurrencies. This means that criminals can often operate without fear of being caught.

Finally, we asked, WHAT IS CRYPTOCURRENCY FRAUD?

Its response:

Cryptocurrency fraud is a type of fraud that involves the use of cryptocurrencies to deceive or defraud people. Cryptocurrency fraud can take many forms, including:

• Pump-and-dump schemes: In a pump-and-dump scheme, fraudsters artificially inflate the price of a cryptocurrency by buying it in large quantities and then selling it to unsuspecting investors. Once the price has increased, the fraudsters sell their holdings and the price plummets, leaving investors with worthless tokens.
• Fake cryptocurrency exchanges: Fraudsters often set up fake cryptocurrency exchanges to trick people into investing in cryptocurrencies that do not exist. Once the fraudsters have collected money from victims, they disappear without a trace.
• Fake cryptocurrency wallets: Fraudsters often set up fake cryptocurrency wallets to steal people’s cryptocurrency. Once the fraudsters have stolen the cryptocurrency, they disappear without a trace.
• Cryptocurrency mining scams: Fraudsters often set up cryptocurrency mining scams to trick people into investing in fake cryptocurrency mining schemes. Once the fraudsters have collected money from victims, they disappear without a trace.
• Cryptocurrency investment scams: Fraudsters often set up cryptocurrency investment scams to trick people into investing in fake cryptocurrency investment schemes. Once the fraudsters have collected money from victims, they disappear without a trace.

——–

ChatGPT and now Bard are becoming more and more mainstream and law firms like Conaway & Strickler are finding ways to incorporate AI in to better representing our clients. In addition, it seems only natural to discuss new technologies at the same time as discussion cryptocurrency.

Wire Fraud is a serious white-collar crime and is defined under 18 USC §1343 and states:

Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, or television communication in interstate or foreign commerce, any writings, signs, signals, pictures, or sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both. If the violation occurs in relation to, or involving any benefit authorized, transported, transmitted, transferred, disbursed, or paid in connection with, a presidentially declared major disaster or emergency (as those terms are defined in section 102 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122)), or affects a financial institution, such person shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both. 18 U.S.C.A. § 1343.

Generally, the 11th Circuit has stated that mail or wire fraud occurs when (1) a person intentionally participates in scheme to defraud another (2) of money or property and (3) uses mails or wires in furtherance of that scheme. Cesnik v. Edgewood Baptist Church, 88 F.3d 902 (11th Cir. 1996).

The Department of Justice however does have its own internal limitations for prosecution. According to Justice Manual 9-43.100 (Prosecution Policy Relating to Mail and Wire Fraud), “Prosecutions of fraud ordinarily should not be undertaken if the scheme employed consists of some isolated transactions between individuals, involving minor loss to the victims, in which case the parties should be left to settle their differences by civil or criminal litigation in the state courts. Serious consideration, however, should be given to the prosecution of any scheme which in its nature is directed to defrauding a class of persons, or the general public, with a substantial pattern of conduct.”

Alternatives to prosecutions can also come in the form of Pretrial Diversion (PTD). PTD programs divert certain offenders from traditional criminal justice processing into alternative systems of supervision and services. Individuals who successfully complete a PTD program may qualify for a range of case outcomes, including the declination of charges, dismissal or reduction of charges, or a more favorable recommendation at sentencing.

Navigating serious crimes like these can be the toughest thing you have ever done. Don’t do it alone. Contact our team today for more information about how we can protect your rights.