<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[kickbacks - Conaway & Strickler]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.conawayandstrickler.com/blog/tags/kickbacks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.conawayandstrickler.com/blog/tags/kickbacks/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Conaway & Strickler's Website]]></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 17:00:23 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Trends in Healthcare Fraud Enforcement]]></title>
                <link>https://www.conawayandstrickler.com/blog/trends-in-healthcare-fraud-enforcement/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.conawayandstrickler.com/blog/trends-in-healthcare-fraud-enforcement/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Office of Conaway & Strickler]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2025 13:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Bribery/Kick backs]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Federal Crimes]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Physician License Defense]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Criminal defense]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[doj]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[False Claims Act]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[federal crimes]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[health care fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[healthcare professional defense]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[identity theft]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[kickbacks]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[medicaid fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Medicare Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[money laundering]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Professional License Defense]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[white collar lawyer]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[wire fraud]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The DOJ boasted their record-breaking 2025 healthcare fraud take down in a recent press release that we discussed more generally in another blog post. This post focuses on some of the specific actions taken by the government and highlights the trends across enforcement. DME Fraud Durable Medical Equipment (DME) fraud remains a cornerstone of federal&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>The DOJ boasted their record-breaking 2025 healthcare fraud take down in a recent press release that we discussed more generally in <a href="https://www.conawayandstrickler.com/blog/largest-u-s-health-care-fraud-takedown-324-charged-14-6-b-alleged-loss/">another blog post</a>. This post focuses on some of the specific actions taken by the government and highlights the trends across enforcement.</p>



<p><strong>DME Fraud</strong></p>



<p>Durable Medical Equipment (DME) fraud remains a cornerstone of federal enforcement as seen in the recent takedown. An <a href="https://www.justice.gov/criminal/media/1405361/dl?inline">indictment in the Western District of New York</a> charges a medical doctor with billing roughly $29.6 million for fictious DME and $5.6 million for audio-only telehealth visits, which were brief or never occurred. That doctor produced and maintained false and fictitious medical records and fraudulently certified orders for braces without regard to medical necessity. The doctor now faces federal criminal charges of conspiracy to commit health care fraud, health care fraud, and false statements relating to health care matters.</p>



<p>In <a href="https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/pr/11-defendants-indicted-multi-billion-health-care-fraud-scheme-largest-case-loss-amount">“Operation Gold Rush,”</a> prosecutors in the Eastern District of New York indicted 11 defendants, including two pharmacists, members of a transnational criminal organization based in Russia and Eastern Europe. These individuals allegedly orchestrated a massive Medicare fraud and money-laundering scheme that billed over $10.6 billion to federal health programs—making it the <em>largest case by loss amount ever charged</em> by the DOJ. The group used foreign straw owners to acquire dozens of U.S.-based DME suppliers, then submitted fraudulent claims for equipment such as urinary catheters and glucose monitors that never delivered, exploiting stolen identities and confidential patient data. To date, 19 defendants have been charged in the case, including multiple arrests abroad (Estonia) and at U.S. entry points.</p>



<p><strong>COVID-19 Testing Kickbacks</strong></p>



<p>COVID-19 testing kickback schemes typically involve health care providers or marketers billing Medicare for over-the-counter or lab-based COVID-19 tests that were unnecessary, never provided, or obtained through illicit referrals. These cases often rely on the same core tactics as DME fraud: using stolen or misused patient information, paying illegal kickbacks for referrals, and submitting inflated or false claims to federal programs. In both types of fraud, the perpetrators exploit gaps in oversight during high-demand periods—such as the pandemic or public health emergencies—to rapidly bill large amounts to Medicare, often with little or no patient interaction or verification.</p>



<p>These 2025 takedown includes <a href="https://www.justice.gov/criminal/criminal-fraud/health-care-fraud-unit/2025-national-hcf-court-documents">criminal indictments and civil settlement agreements</a> targeting this type of COVID-19 fraud. An indictment out of Illinois charged multiple individuals, including a physician, for their roles in a kickback scheme. According to the <a href="https://www.justice.gov/criminal/media/1405076/dl?inline">indictment</a>, the defendants caused laboratories in Illinois and Texas to submit fraudulent claims to the HRSA COVID-19 Uninsured Program, ultimately receiving over $293 million in payments. The physician involved allegedly misused patient information—including data from a former hospital employer—to falsely claim that uninsured individuals had submitted samples for COVID-19 testing. In reality, many of the patients had not submitted samples at all. Defendants submitted claims through Texas labs they owned, despite those labs being non-operational. The proceeds were then laundered through various financial accounts to disguise the funds’ origin. Charges include wire fraud, conspiracy to commit money laundering, HIPAA violations, and conspiracy to defraud the United States. Authorities have seized a Rolls Royce Phantom and more than $104 million in assets linked to the fraud.</p>



<p>The charges being brought by the federal government in these cases carry significant criminal penalties and collateral consequences, especially for licensed medical professionals. At Conaway & Strickler, we are highly experienced in defending against these types of claims. <a href="/contact-us/">Contact us</a> to schedule a consultation and discuss your case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Gautam Adani and 5 others charged with Bribery and SEC fraud in the EDNY]]></title>
                <link>https://www.conawayandstrickler.com/blog/gautam-adani-and-5-others-charged-with-bribery-and-sec-fraud-in-the-edny/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.conawayandstrickler.com/blog/gautam-adani-and-5-others-charged-with-bribery-and-sec-fraud-in-the-edny/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Office of Conaway & Strickler]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2024 17:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Bribery/Kick backs]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Federal Crimes]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Federal Sentencing]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Adani]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Bribery]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FCPA]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[federal criminal defense]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[kickbacks]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>A five count indictment was unsealed this past week in the United States District Court of the Eastern District of New York.  The federal court in Brooklyn charged Gautam S. Adani, Sagar R. Adani and Vneet S. Jaain, executives of an Indian renewable-energy company, with conspiracies to commit securities and wire fraud and Securities Fraud&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><a href="https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/media/1377806/dl?inline">A five count indictment</a> was unsealed this past week in the United States District Court of the Eastern District of New York.  The federal court in Brooklyn charged Gautam S. Adani, Sagar R. Adani and Vneet S. Jaain, executives of an Indian renewable-energy company, with conspiracies to commit securities and wire fraud and Securities Fraud for their roles in a billion dollar scheme to obtain funds from U.S. investors and global financial institutions on the basis of false and misleading statements. </p>



<p>The indictment also charges Ranjit Gupta and Rupesh Agarwal, former executives of a renewable-energy company with securities that had traded on the New York Stock Exchange, and Cyril Cabanes, Saurabh Agarwal and Deepak Malhotra, former employees of a Canadian institutional investor, with conspiracy to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act in connection with a bribery scheme also perpetrated by Gautam S. Adani, Sagar R. Adani and Vneet S. Jaain, involving one of the world’s largest solar energy projects. </p>



<p>The indictment alleges that more than $250 Million in bribes were promised to secure solar enery contracts worth 2 billion dollars over two decades. </p>



<p>The SEC also unveiled a <a href="https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/complaints/2024/comp-pr2024-181.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">complaint</a> charging Gautam Adani and Sagar Adani, executives of Adani Green Energy Ltd., and Cyril Cabanes, an executive of Azure Power Global Ltd., for conduct arising out of the same massive bribery scheme discussed in the EDNY. complaint. The SEC also alleges that the bribery scheme was orchestrated to enable the two renewable energy companies to capitalize on a multi-billion-dollar solar energy project that the companies had been awarded by the Indian government. During the alleged scheme, Adani Green raised more than $175 million from U.S. investors and Azure Power’s stock was traded on the New York Stock Exchange. </p>



<p>The indictment alleges, among other things:</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list">
<li>There was a FBI raid in March 2023.   Gautam Adani failed to inform SEBI and the Indian stock exchange of this FBI raid and the DOJ investigation, which he was required to do. But he also thereafter lied when he denied that either had happened.</li>



<li>False statements in the annual reports. Guatam Adani emailed himself photographs of the search warrant of his nephew in March 2023.  He will be unable to say he was not aware of being investigation at that time.</li>



<li>False statements to US investors</li>



<li>When the search was executed on the nephew, Sagar Adani, electronic devices were seized.  This will be a treasure trove of data for the government to use in their prosecution.  The government cites “bribe notes” that Sagar kept on his phone to track specific details of bribes offered and promised to government officials.  It may very well be possible as this case proceeds that a superceding indictment is forthcoming and both Gautam and Sagar Adani will be charged with FCPA violations as well.</li>



<li>Co-Conspirator #1 and #2 may have cooperated with the government, and thus they may help corroborate what “numero uno” and other code names meant when texting amongst themselves about the conspiracy.</li>
</ol>



<p>The defendants do not live in the United States, and it appears only one has dual citizenship in the US.  So, should any of these defendants enter US soil, they will be immediately detained and transferred to the EDNY for processing. Both Gautam and Sagar Adani have not been arrested yet and US prosecutors would need to ask the Indian government to extradite them under the terms of the countries’ extradition treaty.  India would need to consider whether the crime he was charged with in the US is also a crime in India, whether the charges are politically motivated or whether he could face inhumane treatment in the US.  As <a href="https://www.conawayandstrickler.com/meg-strickler.html">Meg Strickler</a> stated in <a href="https://www.thequint.com/explainers/gautam-adani-us-indictment-conspiracy-to-bribe-what-lies-ahead-deep-dive">The Quint</a>, there probably will be a superceding indictment that will include more charges.</p>



<p>Conaway & Strickler, PC handles many bribery cases.  <a href="https://www.conawayandstrickler.com/contact-us.html">Contact us</a> if you need more information or are facing such charges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[What are the current DOJ priorities?]]></title>
                <link>https://www.conawayandstrickler.com/blog/what-are-the-current-doj-priorities/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.conawayandstrickler.com/blog/what-are-the-current-doj-priorities/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Conaway & Strickler, P.C.]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2022 15:03:29 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Criminal Defense]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Cyber Crime]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Cybercrime]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[False Claims Act]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Federal Crimes]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Federal Offenses]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[PPP loan fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Tax Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[White Collar Crimes]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[White Collar Offenses]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[#taxevasion]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[#taxfraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[covid 19 task force]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Criminal Lawyer]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[doj]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[False Claims Act]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[federal criminal attorney]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Federal Criminal Lawyer]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[health care fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[kickbacks]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Medicare Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[PPP Loan Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Qui Tam]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[wire fraud]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Attorney General Merrick Garland made recent comments about what he considered to be the Department of Justice’s top priorities for 2022. Since taking office in March 2021, Garland has tried to combat crime in a tumultuous time. He has been criticized for his handling of January 6 investigation and has stated it’s the most urgent&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>Attorney General Merrick Garland made recent <a href="https://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/attorney-general-merrick-b-garland-delivers-remarks-aba-institute-white-collar-crime" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">comments </a>about what he considered to be the Department of Justice’s top priorities for 2022.  Since taking office in March 2021, Garland has tried to combat crime in a tumultuous time.  He has been criticized for his handling of January 6 investigation and has stated it’s the <a href="https://www.newsweek.com/merrick-garland-jan6-doj-investigation-capitol-rnc-1686802" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">most urgent probe in history.</a></p>


<p>With all of this going on, the US Attorney’s office <em>increased</em> its prosecutions of individuals of white collar crimes in the year 2021.  White collar charges like fraud, theft, corruption, bribery, environmental crime, tax fraud, health care fraud, procurement fraud, money laundering, PPP loan fraud, etc will continue to get more attention from the Department of Justice.</p>


<p>What does this mean?  It means that investigations of any sort need to be taken seriously and that you should contact a lawyer immediately if any wrongdoing is alleged.</p>


<p>Conaway & Strickler, PC has a long history of handling fraud cases of all varieties and is well equipped at fighting the DOJ in their overzealous prosecutions.  Please feel free to contact us so that we can help you avoid future headaches.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Whistleblower / Qui Tam cases in Health Care]]></title>
                <link>https://www.conawayandstrickler.com/blog/whistleblower-qui-tam-cases-in-health-care/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.conawayandstrickler.com/blog/whistleblower-qui-tam-cases-in-health-care/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Conaway & Strickler, P.C.]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2021 16:19:36 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Criminal Defense]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[False Claims Act]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Federal Crimes]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Tax Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[White Collar Crimes]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[False Claims Act]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FCA]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[health care fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[kickbacks]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Medicare Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Qui Tam]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[tax fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[whistleblower]]></category>
                
                
                
                    <media:thumbnail url="https://conawayandstrickler-com.justia.site/wp-content/uploads/sites/908/2021/09/whistleblowerpa.jpg" />
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Health Care Qui Tam cases What does Qui Tam mean? Qui tam is short for the Latin phrase “qui tam pro domino rege quam pro se ipso in hac parte sequitur,” which roughly translates to “he who brings an action for the king as well as for himself.” How does the Qui Tam definition relate&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
<em>Health Care Qui Tam cases</em>
<strong>What does Qui Tam mean? </strong></p>


<p>Qui tam is short for the Latin phrase “<strong>qui tam pro domino rege quam pro se ipso in hac parte sequitur</strong>,” which roughly translates to “he who brings an action for the king as well as for himself.”
<strong>How does the Qui Tam definition relate to litigation today</strong>? </p>


<p>Today the federal False Claims Act (“FCA”) is the federal statute originally enacted in 1863. Many cases are filed under 31 §§ 3729 – 3733 by the government. But the FCA also allows private citizens to file suits on behalf of the government. These are called Qui Tam law suits.  The private party is called a “relator” and they are the ones who bring an action on the government’s behalf.  The government, not the relator, however, is considered the real plaintiff.  Note if successful, a relator in a FCA Qui Tam action can receive up to 30% of the government’s award. The False Claims Act authorizes Qui Tam actions against parties who have defrauded the federal government.  Qui Tam law suits are also called “whistleblower” law suits.
<strong>How does it apply in the Health Care Field?</strong></p>


<p>All Qui Tam actions involve actions against parties who have defrauded the federal government.  Therefore, any current or former employee, consultant, independent contractor etc working in the medical field who has knowledge of schemes to defraud Medicare or Medicaid may be able to file a Qui Tam lawsuit.
<strong>What types of schemes to defraud the federal government in the Health Care field are common? </strong></p>


<p>Although not an exhaustive list, below are some common schemes to defraud:<strong> </strong></p>


<p>-upcoding</p>


<p>-billing for dead patients</p>


<p>-billing for ineligible patients</p>


<p>-billing for services not provided</p>


<p>-unbundling </p>


<p>-kickbacks</p>


<p>-providing services that were not reasonable or medically necessary and/or failed to provide adequate and appropriate services to its patients.  </p>


<p>Please see <a href="https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-recovers-over-22-billion-false-claims-act-cases-fiscal-year-2020" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-recovers-over-22-billion-false-claims-act-cases-fiscal-year-2020</a> for details on FCA claims for the year 2020.</p>


<p>Should you have additional questions or concerns about a potential whistleblower case for SEC, Health Care, Procurement, Education/Grant or Tax Fraud, please feel free to reach out to Conaway & Strickler, PC for more information.  404-816-5000 or info@cs-lawyers.com</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>