Recently, the Department of Justice highlighted enforcement efforts that allegedly aimed at protecting  Americans from transnational fraud schemes.  Here are some of the cases discussed:

United States v. Troy Murray and United States v. Cutter Murray. On June 11, 2025, DOJ’s Consumer Protection Branch filed an Information in SDFL charging Troy Murray also known as “Steve Dixson” with conspiracy to commit wire fraud. According to court documents, Troy Murray sold to lottery fraud scammers, including Jamaicans, his lead list database containing the names, and personal information of over seven million elderly American consumers. These lists were allegedly then used to defraud elderly victims. Additionally, Cutter Murray, Troy Murray’s son, will plead guilty to one count of money laundering for receiving and then laundering $1.6 million of the fraudulent funds Troy Murray obtained.

United States v. Jimmy Smith. On April 1, 2025 the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Connecticut announced charges against Jimmy Smith, 30, a citizen of Jamaica, who resided in Hinesville, Georgia. According to court documents, Smith and others defrauded at least four victims residing in Connecticut, New York, Texas, and California, by telling them they had won a Publishers Clearing House Sweepstakes and needed to pay taxes or money to claim the prize.

United States v. Charles Uchenna Nwadavid. On April 9, the U.S. Attorney’s Office (USAO) for the District of Massachusetts announced charges against Charles Uchenna Nwadavid, a citizen of Nigeria who was arrested after landing at the Dallas-Fort Worth Airport. In January 2024, a grand jury indicted Nawadavid on one count of mail fraud and two counts of money laundering. Between approximately 2016 to September 2019, Nwadavid allegedly participated in romance scams that tricked victims into sending money abroad.  He plead guilty to mail fraud, aiding and abetting money laundering and money laundering on June 26, 2025.  The DOJ states “romance schemes”  generally begin when the “bad actors” recruit victims through advertisements for online relationships on dating or social media websites. Individuals perpetuating romance scams often create fictitious profiles and then use them to gain victims’ trust through a purported romantic relationship. Perpetrators then direct their victims to send money or to conduct financial transactions involving other victims’ money under false pretenses, such as an urgent need for money to secure a multi-million dollar inheritance or to pay for an unexpected hospitalization.

Another romance scheme can involve investing in cryptocurrency. The United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Ohio (USAO) has filed a civil complaint in forfeiture against 8,207,578 Tether (USDT) cryptocurrency, valued at more than $8.2 million in February, 2025.   In that case, investigators found that scammers initially contacted the victims through seemingly misdirected, or “wrong number,” text messages. The fraudster then gained the victim’s trust and affection using various manipulative tactics. Once trust was established with the victim, the fraudster would share how much success they, or someone they knew, had with investing in cryptocurrency. This personal testimonial lessened any uncertainties the victims may have had about virtual currencies and eventually had the intended effect to persuade the victim to proceed with the investment.

The fraudster would then guide the victim, step-by-step, on how to open a legitimate cryptocurrency account, most often with a U.S. based virtual currency exchange such as Crypto.com or Coinbase. The scammer would walk the victim through the entire process of transferring money from their bank to the newly created cryptocurrency account. Next, the victim received instructions on how to transfer the purchased cryptocurrency assets to an online “investment platform,” which would turn out to be a fake site created by the fraudsters to look like a legitimate company. Information on the platforms promised lucrative returns which encouraged victims to invest further. However, once the victim transferred their funds to the “investment platform” they unknowingly handed over complete control and ownership of their funds to the scammer.  These fake cryptocurrency trading platforms or fake versions of official crypto wallets to trick unsuspecting victims. These fake websites usually have similar but slightly different domain names from the sites they attempt to mimic.

The complaint also outlines that the perpetrators of such investment fraud schemes often allow victims to withdraw a portion of their “profits” early on in the scheme to build trust and reinforce their belief that the “investment platform” was legitimate. But as the scheme progressed, victims were unable to withdraw their funds and given excuses as to why they could not access their funds. For example, the fraudsters referred to a fake “tax” requirement, stating that taxes must be paid on the proceeds generated from the investment platform. Knowing that the scam would run its course soon, the fraudsters used last-ditch efforts to lie to victims that they had to pay a tax. Ultimately, victims were locked out of their account on the investment platform and lost their funds.

A woman in Lake County, Ohio became the target of such a scam when she responded to a text on her phone from an unknown number in November 2023. She began sharing information via text with the person and the two bonded over topics such as hobbies and religion. Over a period of time, the victim followed instructions from her new “friend” and opened an account at Crypto.com and then transferred funds into the account. When the victim wanted to withdraw funds, her “friend,” relented and said additional payments were needed and she complied. When the victim no longer had any funds left after making additional payments, her “friend” began to threaten her that he would send his friends to “take care of” her friends and family. Having lost her entire life savings of approximately $663,352, including funds from her Roth IRA, the victim filed a complaint with the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center to report the losses in June 2024. The FBI Cleveland Division subsequently initiated an investigation.

United States v. 679,981.22 Tether, et al. On June 3, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Ohio announced the filing of a civil forfeiture complaint against 679,981.22 in the Tether cryptocurrency suspected of being fraudulently obtained as part of a romance/investment scam. According to court documents, one victim was targeted via LinkedIn and another victim was targeted though the dating App “Coffee Meets Bagel.”

The experienced federal criminal defense attorneys at Conaway & Strickler, PC are here to protect your rights, reputation, and future should you be under investigation. With decades of experience in defending traditional financial fraud paired with a deep understanding of the newer world of cryptocurrency, our firm possesses the skills and expertise to assist those accused of any type of fraud.  Call or contact us online for a confidential consultation.

DME Fraud

Durable Medical Equipment (DME) fraud remains a cornerstone of federal enforcement as seen in the recent takedown. An indictment in the Western District of New York charges a medical doctor with billing roughly $29.6 million for fictious DME and $5.6 million for audio-only telehealth visits, which were brief or never occurred. That doctor produced and maintained false and fictitious medical records and fraudulently certified orders for braces without regard to medical necessity. The doctor now faces federal criminal charges of conspiracy to commit health care fraud, health care fraud, and false statements relating to health care matters.

In “Operation Gold Rush,” prosecutors in the Eastern District of New York indicted 11 defendants, including two pharmacists, members of a transnational criminal organization based in Russia and Eastern Europe. These individuals allegedly orchestrated a massive Medicare fraud and money-laundering scheme that billed over $10.6 billion to federal health programs—making it the largest case by loss amount ever charged by the DOJ. The group used foreign straw owners to acquire dozens of U.S.-based DME suppliers, then submitted fraudulent claims for equipment such as urinary catheters and glucose monitors that never delivered, exploiting stolen identities and confidential patient data. To date, 19 defendants have been charged in the case, including multiple arrests abroad (Estonia) and at U.S. entry points.

COVID-19 Testing Kickbacks

COVID-19 testing kickback schemes typically involve health care providers or marketers billing Medicare for over-the-counter or lab-based COVID-19 tests that were unnecessary, never provided, or obtained through illicit referrals. These cases often rely on the same core tactics as DME fraud: using stolen or misused patient information, paying illegal kickbacks for referrals, and submitting inflated or false claims to federal programs. In both types of fraud, the perpetrators exploit gaps in oversight during high-demand periods—such as the pandemic or public health emergencies—to rapidly bill large amounts to Medicare, often with little or no patient interaction or verification.

These 2025 takedown includes criminal indictments and civil settlement agreements targeting this type of COVID-19 fraud. An indictment out of Illinois charged multiple individuals, including a physician, for their roles in a kickback scheme. According to the indictment, the defendants caused laboratories in Illinois and Texas to submit fraudulent claims to the HRSA COVID-19 Uninsured Program, ultimately receiving over $293 million in payments. The physician involved allegedly misused patient information—including data from a former hospital employer—to falsely claim that uninsured individuals had submitted samples for COVID-19 testing. In reality, many of the patients had not submitted samples at all. Defendants submitted claims through Texas labs they owned, despite those labs being non-operational. The proceeds were then laundered through various financial accounts to disguise the funds’ origin. Charges include wire fraud, conspiracy to commit money laundering, HIPAA violations, and conspiracy to defraud the United States. Authorities have seized a Rolls Royce Phantom and more than $104 million in assets linked to the fraud.

The charges being brought by the federal government in these cases carry significant criminal penalties and collateral consequences, especially for licensed medical professionals. At Conaway & Strickler, we are highly experienced in defending against these types of claims. Contact us to schedule a consultation and discuss your case.

The DOJ’s Health Care Fraud Unit coordinated the investigation with the help of strike forces across the nation. Key aspects of the historical take down include the following:

• Enormous monetary scale: Again, the federal government alleges $14.6 billion in intended losses in total across the criminal cases. Law enforcement has already seized $245 million in cash, luxury vehicles, cryptocurrency, and assets from alleged fraudsters. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) also proactively prevented $4 billion in fraudulent payments, suspended billing privileges of 205 providers.
• Civil charges and settlements: In addition to criminal charges being levied, law enforcement has also sought civil penalties from other providers and medical professionals. This includes civil charges against 20 defendants for $14.2 million in alleged fraud, as well as civil settlements with 106 defendants totaling $34.3 million.
• Transnational criminal networks: A major component—Operation Gold Rush—alleges a global ring used foreign straw owners to submit $10.6 billion in false claims for durable medical equipment. Though CMS blocked all but ~$41 million in Medicare payouts, insurers received about $900  Individuals abroad and co-conspirators in the U.S. used encrypted messaging and assumed identities to facilitate the purchase of medical supply companies and subsequent fraud by exploiting the stolen identities of over one million Americans spanning all 50 states and using their confidential medical information to submit the fraudulent claims.
• Telemarketing/genetic testing schemes: One $703 million scheme involved deceptive telemarketing, AI-generated “consent” calls, and stolen Medicare IDs—all to bill labs and DME suppliers
• Wound-care fraud on vulnerable patients: Roughly $1.1 billion in fraudulent Medicare submissions for amniotic allografts were applied to terminally‑ill or hospice patients, without medical need or oversight
• Opioid prescription diversion: 74 defendants, including 44 medical professionals, are accused of diverting over 15 million pills (e.g., oxycodone, hydrocodone), feeding the illegal drug trade
• Genetic testing & telemedicine: At least 49 defendants were tied to over $1.17 billion in telemedicine/genetic testing fraud, a key enforcement focus of the Takedown.

These are just some of the schemes and methods alleged as health care fraud. Additional cases totaling approximately $1.84 billion involved medically unnecessary tests and treatments, kickbacks, and stolen controlled substances. DOJ’s Health Care Fraud Unit, along with FBI, HHS‑OIG, DEA, CMS, and state AGs, led this nationwide operation. The Government was able to leverage cloud computing, artificial intelligence, and advanced analytics to identify emerging health care fraud schemes. Specifically, a new Data Fusion Center used AI to spot suspicious billing patterns

Professionals in the medical industry could face disruptions based on these trends. Individuals could be criminally indicted despite a lack of financial gain for any peripheral involvement in these schemes. With over 205 providers with billing privileges already suspended or revoked, firms must evaluate billing practices and ensure compliance before audits or criminal actions escalate. Medical professionals and individuals in the industry should be proactive in address any potential problems. Assessing practices through comprehensive billing audits, tightening consent documentation and patient qualification protocols, and reviewing prescribing practices are key to ensuring compliance.

Given the unprecedented scope of this takedown, anyone involved in Medicare/Medicaid billing—especially in telemedicine, genetic testing, wound care, DME supply, opioid prescribing—should evaluate their practices now. Protecting your license, assets, and reputation hinges on early legal counsel, transparent operations, and robust documentation. Upon any contact from law enforcement, individuals should secure legal counsel immediately. The presumption of innocence matters, and charges are allegations—not convictions. Early intervention and strong representation can shift outcomes. Medical providers should document everything diligently. Medical necessity, patient consent, referrals, and codes must be in writing and defensible.

Even if charges carry potential fines or incarceration, negotiated resolutions mitigating those consequences are viable. At Conaway & Strickler, we are highly experienced in federal health care fraud cases. Contact us to discuss your situation confidentially—we’re here to protect your rights and your future.

• Wire fraud
• Mail fraud
• Bank fraud
• Tax fraud (tax evasion or false statements)
• Healthcare fraud/FCA
• Medicare/Medicaid fraud
• PPP loan or COVID relief fraud
• Securities fraud
• Mortgage fraud
• Immigration or visa fraud
• Government contract fraud
• Identity theft or benefits fraud
• Trafficking in Counterfeit Goods or Services
• Anti kickbacks
• AML

The FBI gives this list of frauds and the DOJ publishes some of their cases here.

Fraud investigations can begin in a number of ways. In many cases, they are triggered by:

• A whistleblower or former employee
• A suspicious activity report
• A suspicious activity report (SAR) from a bank or financial institution
• Data flagged by automated fraud detection software
• A referral from another federal agency (e.g., IRS, SBA, USPS, HHS)
• A civil audit or regulatory review that uncovers irregularities
• Investigative journalism or public tips
• Problems in real estate transactions.  (FINCEN’s new rule extends Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (CFT) obligations to investment advisers involved in these transactions)

Once red flags are detected, the matter is referred to a federal investigative agency. These can include:

• Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
• Internal Revenue Service – Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI)
• Office of Inspector General (OIG)
• Postal Inspection Service (USPIS)
• Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
• Health and Human Services (HHS)
• Small Business Administration (SBA)

If you have been contacted by federal agents FOR ANY REASON, contact a federal criminal defense attorney immediately.  Do not speak period.  If you have received a grand jury subpoena, contact a federal criminal defense attorney immediately.  If you have received a target letter, contact a federal criminal defense attorney immediately.  If you are being audited by the IRS, SBA, HHS or another agency, contact a federal criminal defense attorney immediately. It never hurts in this  last instance to have sage advice before the investigation goes any further.

At Conaway & Strickler, PC, we are here to help. Contact us to discuss your options.

When the federal government is paying for items or services rendered to Medicare or Medicaid beneficiaries, federal fraud and abuse laws apply. Healthcare professionals influence what services patients receive and are responsible for the documentation of those services. That documentation is the basis for bills sent to insurers, and ultimately, the Government’s payment of a beneficiary’s medical claims.

If a physician knew or should have known that the submitted claim was false, the attempt to collect unearned money constitutes a violation. Federal fraud and abuse laws include the following:

• False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733)
• Anti-Kickback Statute (42 U.S.C. §§ 1320a-7b(b))
• Physician Self-Referral (Stark Law).
• Exclusion Statute (42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7).
• Civil Monetary Penalties Law (42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7a).

These laws aim to prevent improper billing practices and financial incentives that could compromise patient care. These laws further grant powerful enforcement tools to federal agencies to penalize violations, ranging from civil fines to criminal charges.

The government can audit claims and investigate providers when there is a reason to suspect fraud. Unusual billing patterns or reports from others, including staff, competitors, and patients, may raise suspicion of fraud and abuse. If you’re a doctor who bills government healthcare programs, compliance with these rules and procedures is critical, as violations can lead to severe legal consequences.

One of the most critical aspects of government payer compliance is coding and billing insurers accurately for services rendered. Physicians may inadvertently engage in practices that violate federal billing regulations. Common billing violations include:

• Upcoding: Billing for more expensive services than those actually provided.
• Unbundling: Separately billing services that are typically bundled together.​
• Unnecessary Services: Providing services that are not medically necessary to increase reimbursement.​
• Kickbacks: Receiving or offering remuneration for patient referrals.
• Billing for services that an improperly supervised or unqualified employee performed.

In addition to maintaining compliance with billing regulations, these laws set forth requirements for maintaining accurate patient records, protecting patient privacy, and more.

Given the complexity and severity of potential penalties, healthcare professionals who find themselves under federal scrutiny for billing practices should seek the counsel of a federal criminal defense attorney as soon as possible. Physicians must be vigilant in adhering to federal billing regulations to avoid severe legal consequences. Understanding the legal framework and implementing proactive measures can safeguard against inadvertent violations and protect your practice’s integrity. Contact us to schedule a consultation.

Crypto money laundering follows the same pattern used for fiat (government-issued) currencies by “cleaning” funds gained through illicit means, before exchanging or withdrawing them for cash. Traditionally, money laundering involves disguising financial assets so they can be used without detection of the illegal activity that produced them. In the context of crypto, tokens are moved through various digital addresses to obscure their illegal origin and make them more difficult to trace.  

The privacy-preserving nature of crypto has opened the door for criminals to conceal the origin of illicitly gained funds through a variety of methods. Cybercriminals ultimately funnel assets through several businesses and online addresses to hide the money trail before transferring the funds to a seemingly legitimate source. 

There are several methods that criminals will use when engaging in cryptocurrency money laundering, including: 

• Smurfing: Splitting up large sums of money into smaller amounts so they can be sent via multiple transactions.  
• Exchange Hopping: Using multiple cryptocurrency exchanges to transfer funds across several platforms and obscure the money trail.  
• Crypto Swaps: Using multiple cryptocurrency wallet addresses to directly convert funds without an intermediary or a centralized exchange. 
• Offshore Transactions: Creating offshore accounts to hide the origin of funds. 
• Mixing: Blending together the crypto assets of multiple users, making it difficult to determine who owns what.   
• Gambling Platforms: Depositing tokens into online gambling websites to be either withdrawn as cash or used to place coordinated bets.  

Cybercriminals require other actors (individuals and sometimes shell companies) to facilitate this crypto money laundering. Like traditional money laundering, criminals recruit “money mules” to move or launder the illicit funds, often unknowingly. In the context of crypto, this is often done under the guise of a cryptocurrency investment scheme.  

Just as traditional money laundering can be federally prosecuted under 18 U.S.C. § 1956, crypto money laundering is a crime under that same law. In addition to money laundering charges, involvement in a cryptocurrency scam can lead to charges including conspiracy, wire fraud, mail fraud, and more. Further, individuals at all levels of these schemes can face prosecution, including those who may have unwittingly played the role of a money mule. 

With decades of experience in defending traditional financial fraud paired with a deep understanding of the newer world of cryptocurrency, our firm possesses the skills and expertise to assist those accused of crypto fraud. Contact us for a free consultation.  

1. NPDB Reports. Licensing boards are generally required to report such these informal agreements involving physicians to the National Practitioners Data Bank (“NPDB”). (See45 CFR § 60.8). Hospitals and other entities are required or permitted to check the NPDB during the physician credentialing process. An NPDB report can permanently tarnish a physician’s record and career, unless it is removed, and it may also result in the additional actions outlined below.
2. Reciprocal Actions by Other State Licensing Boards. Many if not all state licensing boards automatically impose reciprocal sanctions against providers who were sanctioned in another state; thus, the action in one state may result in similar actions in other states in which the provider is licensed. That, of course, compounds the physician’s problems.
3. Adverse Action by Other Agencies. Other agencies may initiate their own investigation based on the board’s order. For example, an order with terms relevant to prescribing practices can trigger an investigation by the state pharmacy board. A stipulation involving inappropriate conduct with the patient might lead to criminal charges by the local law enforcement agency. Although such collateral investigations are fairly rare and are usually limited to situations involving egregious facts, there is no guarantee that the physician will be able to avoid lengthy and costly investigations or proceedings by other agencies.
4. Adverse Employment Action. Employment contracts often condition employment on an unrestricted license and require the provider to disclose or represent that the provider has not been the subject of adverse licensure action. Depending on the language of the contract and the mood of the employer, a seemingly innocuous board order may result in loss of employment. At the very least, it will likely undermine the provider’s position with the employer.
5. Adverse Credentialing Actions. Like employment contracts, hospitals or other facilities consider adverse licensure actions in their credentialing decisions. Depending on the medical staff bylaws and credentialing policies, licensure stipulations may allow the hospital or facility to deny, suspend, restrict, or terminate a provider’s medical staff membership or privileges, thereby limiting the provider’s practice options. Such adverse credentialing actions may also adversely affect the physician’s employment or relationships with payers who are affiliated with the hospital.
6. Adverse Publicity. In most states, the licensing board is permitted or required to publish the action. Colleagues, patients and others in the community are likely to learn of the stipulation, resulting in professional embarrassment, diminished reputation, and loss of business.
7. Malpractice Insurance. Depending on underwriting requirements, a board order may adversely affect the provider’s ability to secure or maintain professional liability insurance or the premiums charged for such insurance.
8. Litigation. Finally, the stipulation may result in civil lawsuits. The stipulation may spark suits by plaintiffs affected by the underlying concerns. In addition, plaintiffs’ lawyers may attempt to use the stipulation in subsequent litigation against the provider. Even though the stipulation will likely be irrelevant and inadmissible to most malpractice cases, it can still cause discomfort and increase the costs of defense.

Given the potential penalties, providers should carefully consider the consequences of any consent order entered into with the Board. If there is no effective defense to the allegations, the provider may have little choice but to agree to an appropriate stipulation to minimize costs and avoid potentially worse sanction; however, the provider should attempt to negotiate the terms in the stipulation to minimize his or her exposure. For example, the board might be willing to agree to a private censure or public reprimand instead of imposing restrictions or conditions on licensure. Alternatively, the provider might be able to modify the stipulation to confirm that it does not constitute a restriction on the license, does not limit the physician’s practice, and there was no harm or risk to patients. The provider might try to include other provisions that mitigate the harm or minimize the need for future disclosures. As appropriate, the provider should work with a knowledgeable attorney to help evaluate the risks and craft the stipulation in a manner to minimize the damage it will undoubtedly cause. For a consultation, contact us today.

Jury Selection also known as Voir Dire

Jury selection is one of the most important parts of a federal criminal trial.  It will start with about 40 potential jurors brought in. Usually we move our chairs to the other side of the table to face them. We ask general questions, then individual questions. Then, we deliberate on who to choose. Then, the court asks us to do our strikes, and then a jury is empaneled.

This usually takes a full day.

Opening Statement

After the jury has been empaneled and sworn, and loads of logistical information is given to the jurors by the judge, then the federal district court judge will invite the AUSA to give their opening statement. Like the jury selection, the opening statement is a critical part of a federal criminal trial.

The purpose of the opening statement is to allow the parties to explain to the jury what the case is about. While the parties may discuss the evidence, and explain what they believe it will show, they are not allowed to make arguments about what they think the evidence means.

After the AUSA has given their opening statement, which they are required to do because they have the burden of proof, the federal district court judge will ask the defense attorney if (s)he wishes to give an opening statement. The judge asks this in the form of a question because the defense attorney is not required to give an opening statement.

In a criminal case, the federal criminal defense lawyer may either give an opening statement, waive the opening statement, or waive the opening statement at that time, instead giving their opening statement at the close of the AUSA’s case.  If this was a multi defendant trial, the judge usually will go in order as it is depicted on the most recent indictment.

Direct Examination begins after we are done with the opening statements.  The AUSA will begin calling their witnesses.  Federal criminal defense attorney teaches advanced evidence to LLM and JD students and GSU law and trial techniques at Emory Law.  She literally teaches the Federal Rules of Evidence on what comes in at trial and how to do direct and cross examinations to law students.

Most direct examinations include three stages:

1. Introduction and background of the witness.
2. Laying the foundation of their relation to the case
3. Substantive questions about the case.

Like all criminal cases, in a federal criminal trial, the entire burden of proof is on the AUSA. In thinking how to proceed, an AUSA will consider all elements of the crimes alleged. This is because every crime is made up of parts, or elements. The elements are set forth in the instructions to the jury. To prevail, the AUSA must prove each and every element of the crime. Consequently, the AUSA will call witnesses that have information they believe will help persuade the jury that an element has been satisfied.

Because this is direct examination, the AUSA may only ask open ended questions. This is often as simple as, “what happened next?” A question used for direct examination may not suggest an answer. Therefore, it would not be appropriate for the AUSA to tell the witness what they think happened, and then ask the witness to agree. Thus, the AUSA cannot properly say “and the next thing that happened was….do you agree?” This leading question would constitute cross-examination. The party who called the witness may not “lead” the witness and may only ask direct examination questions. Such a leading question would likely prompt the objection of any of us federal criminal defense lawyers.

There are some exceptions to this rule, however, and some leading questions are allowed during direct examination. For example, Rule 611 of the Federal Rules of Evidence suggests that an AUSA may use cross-examination as necessary to “develop the witnesses testimony.” Leading questions may also be used with a “hostile witness.”

Once the witness has testified on direct, the defense lawyer will get to conduct Cross-Examination of the government’s witnesses.

We may ask questions of the government’s witness after the AUSA has completed their direct examination. Again, the defense attorney is not required to ask questions because they have no burden of proof. While there may be strategic reasons for waiving a witness, in some instances, we will engage in extensive and detailed questioning or cross-examination of the government witness.

Most cross-examination questions include the following:

1. We draft question to elicit any positive information from the witness.
2. We work to limit the damage done by the cross-examination.
3. We will impeach the witness where appropriate.

The defense attorney’s questioning can proceed by either direct or leading questions. A leading question is one that suggests the answer. This is called cross-examination. The purpose of cross-examination is to expand on the witness’s testimony, and possibly to show that the witness lacks credibility or that their fact statements are wrong or misleading.

Cross-examination may also be used by us defense attorneys to show the jury that the government witness lacks actual knowledge, or that their knowledge is limited. This is especially true for expert witnesses. To expand on the above example, a defense attorney may cross-examine a forensic computer expert by asking them questions to show that they lack credentials. A cross-examination like this might be a simple statement to the witness such as “you don’t have a computer science degree?”

At the end of the government’s case, when there are no more witnesses or evidence, the AUSA will tell the judge that they “rest.” This means the AUSA’s case is completed.

At this juncture, we will all orally ask for a Motion for Directed Verdict

In a federal criminal case, a motion for directed verdict is a motion requesting the judge to acquit the defendant as a matter of law. If the motion is granted, the case is done, and the defendant is declared the winner. A motion for directed verdict is also called a judgment as a matter of law.

While a motion for judgment as a matter of law may be made at any time before the case is submitted to the jury, the first opportunity for a federal criminal defense attorney to make such a motion is after the government has rested its case. In the attorney’s motion, we will offer to the judge any applicable law and explain why, based on this law, the facts of the case entitle the defendant to be found not guilty. An AUSA may not make a motion for directed verdict after the defense has rested.

In a typical federal criminal trial, once the AUSA has indicated that the government has rested its case, the district court judge will instruct the bailiff to escort the jury out of the courtroom. The judge will then ask the defense attorney if they have a motion for directed verdict. If the answer is no, then the jury will be brought back into the courtroom and the case will continue. Motions for directed verdict are always made outside the presence of the jury.

A federal criminal defense attorney may also make a motion for directed verdict at the end of the attorney’s case; meaning, after the defense has indicated to the court that they rest. This is because, as indicated, Rule 50 of the Federal Rules of Procedure allow a motion as a matter of law to be made any time before the jury has reached its verdict.

DEFENSE: 

The defendant in a criminal case enjoys a presumption of innocence. One of the benefits of this presumption is that a person accused of a crime does not have an obligation to prove their innocence to the jury. This means there is no obligation to call any witnesses or produce any evidence. However, depending on the facts and circumstances of a case, it may be in the your best interest to call witness or provide evidence.

So, should any of us federal criminal defense attorneys call a witnesses, just as when the AUSA calls witnesses, the attorney may only ask this witness direct examination question, and the AUSA may cross-examine this witness using leading questions.

One of the witnesses that is available only to the defense attorney is the defendant. In a criminal case the accused has the right to remain silent. Therefore, only the defense attorney can call the accused to the stand. Whether to call the accused as a witness is often one of the most difficult questions for a federal criminal defense attorney. However, the final answer to this question resides completely with YOU. The decision must not be made by the lawyer.

Once all of the defense attorneys call all of their witnesses (if any), they will indicate to the court that “the defense rests.”

Next, we move to The Government’s Rebuttal Witnesses

The defense may call rebuttal witnesses after it has rested because the government has the burden of proof. Rebuttal witnesses serve largely the same function as cross-examination in that they are used as part of an attempt, in this case by the government, to disprove evidence submitted by the defendant or to disprove what the defense witnesses said. It is rare, but possible, for the federal district court judge to allow what is called surrebuttal on the part of the defense. A surrebuttal witness is called by a party to respond to the opposing party’s rebuttal.

Closing Arguments

Once all the witnesses have been called, both the AUSA and we, the federal defense criminal defense attorneys, have presented all their evidence, and both have indicated to the court that they have rested, the next step is closing argument.

According to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the government goes first, the defense attorneys goes next, then the government gets another opportunity to rebut what the defense attorney has argued. The government gets to go first, and last, because they have the burden of proof.

Unlike the opening statement, in their final arguments, the AUSA and the federal criminal defense attorney may not only summarize the evidence presented but may also forcefully argue why the jury should find in their favor.

It is important to note, that district court judges will typically deny us the time, at the end of the trial, to leave and prepare our closing arguments.  It is typical to move right into closing arguments after all the evidence has been received by the jury, and any directed verdict motions made and denied.

The Jury is then instructed as to the applicable law through what is known as jury charges.

The main purpose of a jury is to resolve issues of fact. A jury will reach its verdict by taking the law as provided to them by the judge and applying to this law to the facts as they find them. In this way they will arrive at their verdict. This law is set forth in the jury instructions.

Judges routinely state they will rely mainly on the pattern instructions prepared by the Circuit Committee on Pattern Criminal Jury instructions.  We certainly research notable and useful jury charges and file such if we determine the pattern charges are not sufficient.

Deliberations and Verdict

The final stage in a federal criminal trial will be jury deliberations and verdict. The first thing the jury will do is select, often by voting, who will be their foreperson. Pattern jury instruction for the 11th circuit provides that the foreperson’s job is to do two things: (1) guide the jury’s deliberations and (2) be a liaison for communications with the court.

If the jury has questions, then normally, the foreperson will write it down, give it to the court officer who then gives the question to the judge. The jury may not tell anyone outside the jury where their “vote” stands or anything else about their deliberations. There is, however, no rule that says that only the foreperson may write down questions or give them to the court officer. In this way all jurors are “equal”.

In a criminal case the verdict must be unanimous in favor of acquittal or conviction. In a federal criminal case, a jury will be instructed they are to continue their deliberations until they have reached a unanimous decision. Pattern Jury Instructions on this issue provide that to find a defendant guilty in a federal criminal trial, the jury must unanimously agree that the government has overcome the presumption of innocence as to every element of the crime alleged and have done so with evidence that proves the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

As set forth in another Pattern Jury Instruction, the jury will be told that they are not to consider punishment in their deliberations. Punishment is solely the province of the judge presiding over the case.

Once the jury has reached its verdict, another Pattern Jury Instruction provides that the foreperson mark the appropriate place for guilty or not guilty, have each member sign the form, then give it to the court officer, who will then give the form to the judge.

Upon learning that the jury has reached its verdict, the judge will resume the trial, making sure the defendant is in the courtroom. Finally, the verdict will be read in court.

Once the verdict is read, if you are found guilty, the deputies (who have moved in to position for this moment) will come forward and ask you to put your hands behind your back and take off shoe laces, jewelry, etc in order to go in to custody.  The federal criminal defense attorney immediately asks that the defendant remain out on an appeal bond, and the judge decides on whether or not to take the defendant in to custody at this time.

If you are found not guilty on all charges, then the case is over and closed.

Should you have any further questions about federal criminal defense trials please contact us.  We are here to help.

Kousisis comes before the Court after a Philadelphia-area government contractor was found guilty of fraud after it failed to comply with a contract provision intended to promote diversity. Stamatios Kousisis and Alpha Painting and Construction Co., Inc. (Alpha) secured two substantial contracts with the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT). These contracts mandated a certain percentage of work to be allocated to Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBEs). Kousisis and his company misrepresented their compliance with this requirement by using a DBE as a mere pass-through entity, thereby falsely claiming adherence to the DBE participation goals. Despite this deception, the contracted work was completed to PennDOT’s satisfaction, and no direct financial loss was incurred by the department.

Federal prosecutors charged Kousisis and Alpha with wire fraud, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, and making false statements. The prosecution’s argument was based on the “fraudulent inducement” theory, suggesting that the defendants obtained the contracts through deceptive promises, even though PennDOT did not suffer a financial loss. Ultimately, Kousisis was sentenced to 70 months’ imprisonment for the multi-million dollar fraud he perpetrated following a jury trial in 2018.

However, the defense has argued that for a fraud conviction, there must be an intent to cause economic harm, which they claim was absent in this case. During oral arguments, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson posed the question, “Why isn’t this a classic scheme to obtain property under false pretenses?” For years in federal white-collar cases, the “scheme” itself has always been recognized as the “harm” that triggers application of the federal fraud statutes. Despite that precedent, defense argued: “If there’s no harm that occurs in those transactions, there is no fraud.”

It seems that conservative justices were receptive to the defendant’s argument. Chief Justice John Roberts suggested that “such crimes were better handled by state prosecutors.” Justice Samuel Alito expressed that “the court really doesn’t like the federalization of white-collar prosecutions and wants that to be done in state court and is really hostile to this whole enterprise.”

The outcome of Kousisis v. United States holds the potential to redefine the scope of federal white-collar prosecutions. A decision favoring the defendants could lead to a substantial shift in prosecutorial responsibilities from federal to state authorities. A ruling that limits federal jurisdiction in such cases would compel companies to adapt by focusing more on state-level compliance and legal frameworks. Engaging with experienced legal counsel will be essential for businesses to remain compliant and mitigate risks in this evolving legal landscape.

Question: What types of issues come before the State of Georgia Nursing Board?

Answer: Below are some common issues the Board handles. Many of these issues may overlap, as most of this conduct also constitutes a crime.

1. Mishandling/misuse of drugs. This includes diverting medications intended for patients, taking medications for your own use, failing to document or inventory medications correctly, or submitting unauthorized prescriptions to pharmacies.
2. Sexual misconduct. This could include allegations of inappropriate sexual relationships with patients or sexually harassing colleagues.
3. Patient abuse or neglect. If a nurse physically, verbally, or mentally abuses a patient, or fails to provide them with timely or sufficient treatment, this could result in the loss of the nurse’s license.
4. Fraud. This may include allegations of falsifying patient records, misrepresenting credentials like education credits or diplomas, sending incorrect or inflated bills to insurance companies, etc.
5. Criminal convictions. Many convictions can disqualify nurses from practicing (such as driving under the influence or drug possession). Importantly, you can also lose your license if you do not disclose a past conviction (see below for more on the license renewal process).

Question: What happens when a complaint is filed against you?

Answer: If a complaint is filed against you with the board of nursing, the Board will review the complaint and open an investigation. If the allegations are serious, the board can issue an emergency temporary suspension of your license during the disciplinary process. Depending on the allegations, an investigator may be appointed to gather all necessary information, including documents, witness testimony, etc. The board may also ask you to submit a written response to the allegations in the complaint, along with any supporting evidence. The board will then decide whether there is enough evidence to support the allegations against you and move forward.

The Board may offer a consent order, allowing you to accept penalties without a formal hearing. The consent order typically involves admission to the wrongdoing and submitting to the disciplinary action recommended. If you decline, a formal hearing will be held, and disciplinary actions may follow. If no consent order is agreed to, you will be asked to appear at a formal hearing to defend yourself against the charges. After the hearing, the board will make a final determination. This could range from public reprimand to the suspension or revocation of your license. Even a minor disciplinary action can become a matter of public record, affecting your career and permanent reputation. It is critical to have a qualified attorney guiding you through this process.

Question: Why hire a nursing license defense attorney?

Answer: When a complaint is filed against you, the board of nursing does not consider you innocent until proven guilty, immediately putting you at a disadvantage. The Nursing Board’s primary goal is to protect the public, not defend nurses. With your career at stake, navigating the complexities of an investigation without legal assistance can be risky. Retaining a nursing license defense attorney ensures that your rights are protected, representing your best interests every step of the way.

Question: What if you are concerned about the license renewing process?

Answer: If you’ve been arrested or convicted since your last renewal, you need to proactively address these issues with the board. Building a mitigation packet and addressing any concerns early can significantly increase your chances of renewing your license without penalties. At Conaway & Strickle, PC, we are experienced in working with professionals to mitigate adverse Board actions related to arrests, substance abuse, and mental health issues. We can assist with not only getting your criminal case reduced or dismissed, but also renewing your license without sanctions.

Question: How can a DUI affect your nursing license in Georgia?

Answer: A DUI conviction in Georgia can result in probation and other penalties, such as random alcohol screenings, mental health evaluations, and restrictions on your nursing practice. These probationary conditions can last for years, depending on the severity of the case.

Below is a list of common probationary conditions that can be place on you following a DUI or an impaired driving under the influence of drugs charge in Georgia.

• Three years minimum probation (must be three years of continuous compliance, so the probationary period could be extended if you slip up)
• Psychotherapy Evaluation by a physician board certified in addiction medicine
• Psychotherapy Course of Treatment completion
• Quarterly Reports from Psychotherapist
• Mental and Physical Evaluation, with favorable finding pertaining to ability to perform duties
• Continuing Education Coursework
• Quarterly Reports from Employer
• Quarterly Reports from yourself
• Quarterly Reports from a Substance Abuse Treatment Aftercare program approved by the Board of Nursing
• Monthly PEth (blood alcohol) testing for first 12 months
• Bi-monthly random urine drug screens for duration of probationary period
• Random alcohol screens
• Enrollment in an Affinity Program, like the one offered by the Georgia Nurses Association
• Restrictions on nursing practice, often including an inability to practice in the following areas without prior Board of Nursing Approval: Agency/Pool Assignments; Private Duty Nursing; In-Home Nursing; Internal Float Pools; Travel Nursing; In-Home Hospice.
• Abstaining from alcohol, and mood-altering substances, including controlled substances unless prescribed.
• If prescribed any medication, providing a letter from the prescriber to both the Board of Nursing and the treatment/aftercare provider within 10-days of receiving such subscription.

Conclusion

If you’re facing challenges related to your nursing license, it’s important to act quickly. With the complexities of nursing board investigations and the potential damage to your reputation, having an experienced nursing license defense attorney is crucial. For more information, contact us today.

The FAA’s zero-tolerance policy, implemented in 2021, marked a shift from warnings to immediate enforcement. With incidents like physical assaults on passengers and crew members, the FAA has consistently referred the most egregious cases to the FBI. The FAA can impose civil penalties up to $37,000 per violation, but when these cases are referred for criminal prosecution, offenders face much harsher outcomes.

In 2023, over 1,240 incidents of unruly passenger behavior were reported. Of those, 43 cases were referred to the FBI for criminal prosecution due to their severity. These cases often involve physical altercations or inappropriate behavior that pose a threat to the safety of everyone on board. The FAA’s clear stance on holding individuals accountable shows that passengers who engage in such behavior will face serious repercussions.You can read more about the FAA’s referral process and efforts in their official statement and in further detail from FAA’s unruly passenger policy page.

Once referred to the FBI, many unruly passenger cases lead to federal charges, especially when sexual misconduct or violence is involved. These cases often involve unwanted touching, and allegations of individuals under the influence of alcohol or medication. Federal prison time and long-term consequences await those convicted of these serious crimes. For more information about how the FBI and federal prosecutors handle these cases, you can review this detailed account from the Department of Justice.

Beyond hefty fines, individuals charged with federal crimes for unruly behavior aboard a flight face significant prison time. Sexual misconduct in particular is treated severely, with offenders often sentenced to years in federal prison. The FAA and FBI are clear in their mission: passengers who pose a threat will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

For those facing such charges, it is crucial to seek legal representation immediately. At our firm, we are experienced in defending against federal charges related to in-flight incidents and can provide the guidance needed to navigate these complex cases. Contact us today for a consultation.

What Is the New FINCEN Rule?

FINCEN’s new rule extends Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (CFT) obligations to investment advisers involved in residential real estate transactions. The aim is to prevent illicit financial activities in an industry known for large cash transactions that can serve as vehicles for money laundering, fraud, and other financial crimes.

Previously, residential real estate investments, particularly those conducted through shell companies or trusts, offered a level of anonymity that bad actors could exploit. This new rule eliminates some of that opacity by requiring reporting and disclosure obligations for entities and individuals involved in these transactions.

The final rule imposes several key requirements:

1. Increased Reporting and Disclosure: Individuals and firms engaged in residential real estate investments must now report detailed information regarding the identity of buyers and sellers, the source of funds, and other financial details. This includes both U.S. and foreign investors, adding an extra layer of scrutiny for cross-border transactions.
2. Enhanced Due Diligence: Investment advisers and firms must now conduct thorough due diligence on clients and the source of their funds, ensuring that they comply with AML/CFT standards. This may involve verifying identities, examining financial records, and reporting suspicious activities to FINCEN.
3. Penalties for Non-Compliance: The rule includes penalties for individuals and firms that fail to meet the new AML/CFT obligations. Non-compliance could lead to fines, sanctions, or even criminal charges depending on the severity of the infraction.

For real estate investors, the new FINCEN rule adds a new layer of legal and financial oversight. While the intention is to weed out bad actors, the burden of proof is now on investors and their advisers to ensure compliance. This means that investors will need to be more transparent in their transactions, particularly regarding the source of their funds. Without proof of the funds coming from a legitimate source, criminal charges of money laundering and fraud can result.

As the FINCEN rule takes effect, compliance will be a critical concern for many in the real estate industry. Our firm is experienced in navigating the complex landscape of financial regulations, including defending clients against charges of money laundering and related financial crimes. We can help you understand your obligations under the new FINCEN rule and defend against any accusations of non-compliance or criminal misconduct.

This new regulation represents a major shift for the residential real estate industry. Whether you’re an investor or an adviser, staying compliant is no longer optional—it’s the law. The new FINCEN rule is set to take effect on December 1, 2025. If you have questions about the new rule and how it affects your business, contact ustoday for a consultation.

Airports are high security environments with strict rules enforced through law enforcement, federal agents, TSA checkpoints, drug-sniffing dogs, US Marshals aboard flights, and more. Being arrested at an airport is overwhelming, scary, and often times, completely unexpected. However, the consequences of these arrest can be serious and long-lasting. An arrest at an airport could lead to detention by law enforcement, criminal charges, and the need to retain legal representation.

If you are arrested at an airport, you may be taken into custody and transported to a detention center or police station where you will be held and processed until further legal proceedings. However, this does not always happen at the airport – you may leave the airport and later have a warrant issued for your arrest. In that case, you would still need to turn yourself in for processing with law enforcement. In either circumstance, it is essential to remember your rights, including the right to remain silent and the right to legal counsel. Contacting an experienced criminal defense attorney will help you navigate that distressing process with an advocate by your side.

Airport arrests can lead to severe criminal charges depending on the circumstances of your case. Common criminal charges in this context cover a broad range including drug offenses, sexual offenses, firearm offenses, DUIs, disorderly conduct, battery, theft, trafficking, and fraud. You could also be arrested at the airport for entirely unrelated criminal charges if you are simply identified and apprehended pursuant to an active arrest warrant, such as this recent arrest in Atlanta. Committing crimes while aboard an aircraft (like interfering with the performance of the duties of a flight crew) can lead to federal criminal charges and even more severe penalties. Many of these charges carry significant terms of imprisonment and hefty fines.

A strong legal defense is crucial if you have been arrested at an airport or are under investigation for alleged conduct at an airport. A skilled criminal defense attorney will guide you through the process, explain the charges against you, and evaluate the evidence to develop a defense strategy tailored to your case.

At Conaway and Strickler, we craft a defense based on the unique circumstances of each case and work closely with our clients to pursue favorable resolutions. If you have been arrested or detained at an airport, it is important to hire an attorney that is experienced in this area of law and can safeguard your rights throughout each step of the process. Contact us for a free consultation regarding your case.

Money Laundering refers to the illegal process of concealing the origins of money obtained through criminal activities, making it appear as if it comes from a legitimate source. This is criminalized under 18 U.S.C. § 1956. Money laundering using NFTs involves the illicit use of these digital assets to disguise the origins of illegally obtained funds. In this context, individuals create a fake record of sales on the blockchain by selling NFTs to themselves using different accounts. Once finished, they sell the NFT to an unsuspecting buyer and repeat the process.

Fraud has grown increasingly common in the crypto landscape due to its anonymous and decentralized nature. Fraud involving NFTs can manifest in various ways due to the unique characteristics of these digital assets. This is mostly being prosecuted as wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1343. Some common forms of fraud associated with NFTs include:

1. Fake or Stolen NFTs: Fraudsters might create counterfeit NFTs by copying digital content and attempting to sell them as original or rare pieces. Additionally, they might steal someone else’s artwork or content and mint NFTs to sell without the creator’s consent.
2. False Representation: Individuals might misrepresent the ownership or authenticity of an NFT by falsely claiming it is associated with a particular creator or source, leading buyers to believe they are purchasing something of higher value or legitimacy than it actually holds.
3. Pump-and-Dump Schemes: Similar to traditional financial markets, some individuals may engage in pump-and-dump schemes within the NFT market. This involves artificially inflating the value of certain NFTs through false hype or manipulation, only to sell them off at a high price, leaving unsuspecting buyers with devalued assets.
4. Phishing and Scams: Scammers may use phishing techniques to trick NFT owners into providing their private keys or access to their digital wallets, allowing the fraudster to steal the NFTs. Additionally, fraudulent schemes and fake NFT marketplaces can deceive buyers and sellers into making transactions for non-existent or misrepresented NFTs.
5. Rug-Pull Scheme: As the term suggests, a “rug pull” refers to a scenario where the creator of an NFT and/or gaming project solicits investments and then abruptly abandons a project and fraudulently retains the project investors’ funds.

Law enforcement is continuing to prosecute these types of NFT schemes across the nation, in cases that allege millions of dollars being defrauded. Two defendants were charged for executing a $1 million NFT money laundering and fraud scheme in January 2022. In another NFT rug-pull, Aurelien Michel was charged for diverting $2.9 million dollars in an international fraud scheme.